User talk:Túrelio/Archive18

Talkpage archive from 2023

Need to make a license tag

Hi! I've recently found a photo that is public domain in Kyrgyzstan due to copyright expiration, but I cannot upload it to Commons yet because there is no template for works public domain in Kyrgystan because of copyright expiration (the only tag available for Krygyz works is an exempt tag). Could you create a template for this? Kyrgyzstan has similar copyright laws to many other post-Soviet republics like Uzbekistan (50 year post-publication for anonymous works, 50 years after death of author if author known) that already have tags on Commons. Can you make a tag for this or delegate this to someone who knows how? Thank you!--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Image files marked for 'Speed deletion'

Hello!! Sorry, It seems like I disturbed the commons, though I followed the protocols without noticing the errors. I tried to fix some image problems as I've listed below;

• The youtube link provided as a copyvios for File:Aslay.jpg does not show any image of Aslay or resemblance, I've looked the whole video, you can prove that too. The Image appears nowhere on the internet.
• I replaced an image file for File:Tanasha Donna.jpg. Will it still be deleted?
• Image File:Joseph Marwa (actor).jpg is a free image uploaded to Flickr, I uploaded it to the second website (cited as copyvios) myself. I've taken the image down from the second site, hope it can survive. Afyaniuhai (talk) 22:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

In my time-zone it's too late for a detailed reply today. However, honestly, all your uploads look like they are not your own/original work. --Túrelio (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

I tried fixing them by uploading new versions to some of them and tried both of the nominated Images with tineye.com with 0 results from the web, that makes me have the original copies of the work, I honestly use web archives to look for one time taken image that was deleted,take them and give them free licenses through flickr(since they've got low qualities). Having a high quality image of a living individual to attach it to any meta page is really hard, but re-owning the low quality images is quite something. Have a good night, Hope you'll reconsider the request. Afyaniuhai (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Possible cross-wiki copyvios

Hi Túrelio. You just deleted File:The-Gibraltar-Magazine-Christian-Santos-11-of-12.jpg and File:Karmen Gomez.jpg that I tagged as copyvios. The same uploader has uploaded a number of other files under questionable claims of "own work" that probably also are copyvios too. The uploader's user talk page is also filled with notifications about file licensing stuff. Anyway, would you mind (if you've got the time) taking a quick look at Special:Contributions/Akis Papadopoulos to see if any of this user's other uploads might possibly be OK to keep, or be at least something that should be discussed per in a DR. I've just gone and asked about File:Kapodistrias2.jpg at COM:VPC#PD-Art for File:Kapodistrias2.jpg?, but that's not one of this user's uploads per se. It's the other cross-wiki uploads that seem to be copyvios. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, indeed, quite a number of his older uploads seem to be copyvios, at least not own work. I've speedy-tagged them. For the few remaining I couldn't find any hits. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look at these. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Slmah

Many of these files were nominated for deletion by MarchEnd, who claimed they were uploaded without the subject’s consent. You deleted some of these. I have two questions:

1. Why did you delete some after just 3 days, while apparently ignoring others?
2. Does this require further action (at least a warning to the uploader)?

Brianjd (talk) 12:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

1) I don't remember precisely. In general, as such image are often also copyvios, these will be deleted immediately (for being copyvios). For others of these kind of images, it depends a bit. If there are aggravating factors, such as minor age or hints that it might be revenge-porn, these will also be deleted fast. Those without such additional factors might need to go through a regular DR, as the rationale will likely be OOS. Of course, the user-profile, i.e. upload-pattern/history, also plays a role.

2) The copyvio-notifications are implicit warnings. Feel free to add a OOS-warning. --Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

I checked again, and I saw that two were deleted as copyvios. Another two were deleted ‘per nomination’, suggesting that they were deleted because of the privacy issue. I didn’t see them before deletion, but the ones I can see are mostly intimate images that likely share the same privacy issue. Plus, there is another set of images nominated with a similar rationale, but different wording and by an anonymous user.

For these reasons, we should consider deleting the whole lot and giving the user a warning (at least) about privacy. We don’t have a standard warning for that, as far as I know, and Commons normally does not do a good job of dealing with this issue. Brianjd (talk) 13:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Метротой орнууд.png

Hi, Following up on your revert of flagging this file as a duplicate. File:Метротой орнууд.png is not a perfect duplicate of File:World Metro systems.png, but it is out of date and an orphan. (The original Mongolian-language file it was ported to Commons from is no longer used even in the mn:Метро; that article was switched first to File:World Metro systems.png then to the SVG version of the file.) If not as a duplicate, how would you handle File:Метротой орнууд.png? Should it be flagged for deletion? Or can be it a redirect to File:World Metro systems.png (which is being actively maintained)? Thanks, —Tcr25 (talk) 16:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

HI, ok, I've reverted myself and dupe-processed it to create a redirect. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! — Tcr25 (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For the thankless task of manning the deletion barricades and taking out the trash 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Bello

Can you check if File:TitaConnieDy.jpg falls as a derivative work? Thank you. NewManila2000 (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Likely. Tagged accordingly. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. NewManila2000 (talk) 12:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Persistent disruptive editing

I just wanted to thank you for protecting File:Barbary lion.jpg and to let you know the disruptive editors found a new way to continue their vandalism (one of them uploaded a copy of the image under a new name). Best, M.Bitton (talk) 11:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Deleted and redirected. --Túrelio (talk) 12:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 15:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Astounding Stories 1936-02.pdf when in use at enWS ...

Hi. Please would you contact Wikisource admins prior to simply deleting a work that is transcribed and transcluded at a WS. It causes problems with deletions here first to how the work is visible and makes clean up/removal difficult. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Ok. I will try to keep in mind. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Help for html bug

In Category:Pietro Bussolo there are two cats that if you click on them they are already deleted or moved away... but they still appear there because the still is, apparently, same categories with this simbol at the end (;) that cannot be deleted or moved due to html conflict. Is there a way to fix this? Thank you Sailko (talk) 11:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Indeed strange. Sorry, I have no idea what is happening here. When I manually added Category:Pietro Bussolo to Category:San Cristoforo (Pietro Bussolo) the latter apeared twice (!) in the former. Absolutely strange. --Túrelio (talk) 12:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

undeletion request

Hi Túrelio, Hope you're well, Could you undelete File:Toyota Camry 2.0 E (Taiwan).jpg please as redirects shouldn't be deleted, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy new year!  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks Túrelio, Happy New Year, I hope you and yours have a happy and healthy new year, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 18:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi and happy new year, Turelio, I have patrolled around the project for a while and tagged a lot of copyvios, reverted and reported some vandals, could I get rollback to help more? For example, batch revert if needed? Lemonaka (talk) 14:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Lemonaka,

after looking through :en, :meta and Commons, I think that you are eligible for this tool and have granted it. Please study Commons:Rollback and especially Commons:Rollback#When to use rollback (it's rather short anyway). Happy editing. --Túrelio (talk) 16:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

File deletion

Hello! I would like to ask you about a deletion of this image: c:File:Гольденберг А.Х.jpg

It was uploaded for an article ru:Гольденберг,_Аркадий_Хаимович about a scholar from Russia by mr. Goldenberg himself, since the current photo is rather old and of poor quality. The photo is from his personal archive. I speak on his behalf as his relative. The image was later deleted by you. Why was it deleted? The cited reason is «copyright violation»; the image, once again, is from his personal archive.

To avoid further misunderstandings, the article itself wasn't written by mr. Goldenberg or any of his associates, his only contribution to the article was an image replacement. Veidenov (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Veidenov,

the reason it was deleted is that it was found in a pdf-file at https://science.asu.edu.ru/index.php/files/download/2181. Such findings generally hint to the suspicion that an "own work"-claim might not be true. Now, if Mr. Goldenberg is sure this image was either shot by himself (option 1) or has obtained the copyright from the photographer (option 2), we may solve this issue by sending a permission. If option 2 is true, then ideally the photographer him/herself should send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). If option 11 is true, then Mr. Goldenberg can send the permission by himself. You should go to Commons:Email templates and copy the boxed text under "Email message template for release of rights to a file" (or the equivalent in Russian language (Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/ru)) and paste it into your local text-editor. Then add the filename of the image (from Commons) and the name of the choosen free license. Then, mail it to Mr. Goldenberg and ask him to either send it to the photographer or by himself sign and date it and mail it back directly (not forward) to the above mentioned address. The email will not be made public; only our OTRS-volunteers can read it. --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I would like to specify it a little bit:

1) If we have a photo from mr. Goldenberg's personal archive which is not a selfie, but was taken with no commercial intent, by a friend or a student, and then sent to him, and was never published anywhere, does he have a right to upload it?

2) If we have a photo from mr. Goldenberg's personal archive which is not a selfie, but was taken with no commercial intent, by a friend or a student, and then sent to him, but was later used in a publicatiob, does he have a right to upload it?

It's all a pretty narrow scholarly circle where everyone knows each other and none of the publications are commercial, Russian copiright laws in the field of science are weak and largely neglected, and nobody really bothered with any sort of copyright legalities during the publishing og the book you linked - it was a student's photo made during some conference, it was later used as an illustration for the book which is a collection of articles dedicated to mr. Goldenberg's 70th birthday. It's really implausable that either the publisher (the university where mr. Goldenberg works) or a technical original author of the photo in question (his student) would in any way object to using this image in a wiki article, but also actually bothering with trying to get a technical permission from a student who graduated several years ago would be a pain.

If a photo was taken with no commercial intent, was never used in any commercial way, was sent to a person on the photo in a private manner, and depicts no one elce, does he have a right to upload it without making an original photographer do any paperwork? The old man just wants to look nice in his own Wikipedia article -- Veidenov (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Zwei verschiedene Fotos

Hallo Túrelio,

kannst du dir das hier mal ansehen bitte? Da hat ein Nutzer anscheinend ein Foto durch ein gänzlich anderes ersetzt. Das hattest du revertiert, und es wurde von dem Nutzer praktisch umgehend wieder zurück-revertiert. Das scheint mir nicht sinnvoll. Sofern es zwei legitim hochgeladene Fotos sind, kann man ja sicher beide auf Commons haben, aber doch nicht so. Danke & Gruß, --217.239.0.124 13:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Er wurde inzwischen von meinem Kollegen Achim55 wieder revertiert. Bei der 2. Version ist ja das Problem, dass wir keine Quellen/Autorenangaben dazu haben und sämtliche anderen Uploads dieses Nutzers waren copyvios. --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Ah, danke. Das überrascht mich nur begrenzt, dass der Nutzer es mit den Spielregeln nicht so genau nimmt. Seine übrige Tätigkeit scheint hart ans Cross-Wiki-Spamming zu grenzen. Wieviele von den sechs Sprachen, in denen er publiziert, mag er tatsächlich beherrschen? Deutsch und Englisch jedenfalls nicht.

Über Copyvio hatte ich mir bei dem gelöschten Bild noch am wenigsten Sorgen gemacht: Das sah dermaßen nach Bahnhofs-Knips-Kabine aus, dass da wohl kein Fotograf uns was anhängen würde. Das verbliebene Bild ist wenigstens scharf. Insofern kein Verlust. Den Schlafzimmerblick brauchen wir für die Bebilderung eines enzyklopädischen Artikels auch nicht unbedingt. :D Gruß, --217.239.0.124 23:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Im sorry

Im sorry for the male body part emoji vandalism. it was immature. 104.235.37.46 05:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Also, if I accidentally tripped the filter, it was because I was trying to specify what vandalism I was doing. 104.235.37.46 05:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Profile picture

Hello, I am new to wikipedia and wanted to create a page for my idol. He gave me permission to use the picture on his website but i uploaded it incorrectly. Can you please help me to comply with the regulations so we can use this picture ? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emile_Verstraeten_Profile_Picture.jpg Bibinneke (talk) 10:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bibinneke,

by "permission to use the picture on his website" you propbably meant that you can use this photo in the Wikipedia-article about Emile Verstraeten, right? If yes, you need to know that a permission just for Wikipedia is not accepted here. Media uploaded to Commons need to be under a free license, which allows anybody to use them, even commercially; for details see COM:L. So, you need to talk again with Mr. Verstraeten and ask him specifically if he is willing and (legally) able to release said portrait-image (by Frank Lambrechts) under the choosen CC-license[1] (give him also this link). He will likely need to check it with the photographer. If he is able and willing, then he (or the photographer) should send a confirmation per email directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), where the filename of the image and the name of the license should be mentioned. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Howard Finn.jpg

Hey again, is this image able to be hosted on Commons? I uploaded it a while back using PD-US no notice since it was around the 1940s, but I don't think it was published until 2017 when it was uploaded (most likely by a family member since he had the surname "Volk" and Finn's wife's maiden name was "Volk"). If it isn't, would it be okay for you to delete it? If not I can go through copyvio/deletion nomination. Thanks. reppop^talk 23:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar

Hi Túrelio. I just want to thank you because of your efforts for deleting the my uploads from Pexels.com. Due to a misunderstanding, I have transferred many files from this site. As nobody warned me about this mistake until A. Savin wrote me, I was also not aware of the incorrect licensing. It seems that you spent a serious time to delete this files. I am grateful to you.. Gargarapalvin (talk) 12:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Bilder von der Demo (30.8.19) im Raum Pirnaischer Platz/Hauptbahnhof

Moin, moin. Danke für die Hinweise:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Exerzitien_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_30._August_2019-86.jpg&diff=724830162&oldid=724818456

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Exerzitien_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_30._August_2019-87.jpg&diff=724825677&oldid=724818926

Klar habe ich auch viele klare Photos davon, bei mir DSCN4057 bis 4077, außer den beiden Hochgeladenen als noch 19 Stück. Die Verschwommenen habe ich gegen Ende der Veranstaltung absichtlich aufgenommen (DSCN4074 und 4076), es war schwierig, von den paar tausend Leuten Einverständniserklärungen einzuholen. Außerdem finde ich die Photographien künstlerisch sehr gelungen, sie holen die Atmosphäre recht gut ein. Und dann brauche ich die unbedingt, die gehören zu einer Geschichte, die sich dabei und infolge ereignet hat, mit den bunten Mützen am Hauptbahnhof (Polizeifasching: blaue, grüne, rote, weiße ... Mützen ...) und mal wieder den Sanitötern dort, das übliche volle Programm (die wollten verständlicherweise nicht abgelichtet werden LOL).

Habe die empfohlene Kat. eingetragen:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Exerzitien_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_30._August_2019-86.jpg&diff=724894549&oldid=724892699

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Exerzitien_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_30._August_2019-87.jpg&diff=724897851&oldid=724892702

Hoffe damit, alle Klarheiten über die unklaren Bilder beseitigt zu haben. ;-)

Grüße

--Methodios (talk) 17:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

P.S. Hätt ich doch bloß nichts getan. Wo gehobelt wird, fallen Späne.

--Methodios (talk) 17:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Bei Massenaufnahmen von Massenveranstaltungen ist m.W. kein Einverständnis der Fotografierten erforderlich. Hab den Blurry-Baustein mal entfernt. Das garantiert aber nicht dass kein Anderer später einen LA stellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Peter181

Please No Delete the Files Peter181 (talk) 11:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you uploaded these copyrighted images without providing evidence of permission. --Túrelio (talk) 11:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

What to do for copyright permission. Peter181 (talk) 11:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

You can either look for other images that are evidently under a free license, for example on Flickr. Or, if you prefer the uploaded images, you could try to identify the true photographer or copyright-holder and then ask them whether they would be willing to release it under a free license. If they agree, they need to send a confirmation directly (no forwarding!) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

On deletion of File:Queen Morta of Lithuania.jpg

Permission for this file was received by the author herself! SeriousThinker 16:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Now, that's funny. My deletion was based on your own edit of adding {{Non-free|year=2023|month=January|day=14}}. In addition, as I did not understand your "Limited permission granted"-statement, I checked http://www.lina-kalinauskaite.lt, but found the website "all rights reserved". So, where is said permission? --Túrelio (talk) 16:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

On deletion of File:Johan Sebastiaan Ploem lowRes 80dpi.png

Hello, I see that File:Johan Sebastiaan Ploem lowRes 80dpi.png was deleted. Can you tell me the reasoning for deletion? The Non-free use rationale of the upload was

{{Non-free use rationale | Description = Photograph of Johan Sebastiaan Ploem. Info on copyright holder at link http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/cdroms/cyto10a/copyright.html | Source = http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/cdroms/cyto10a/cytometryhistory/individualhistories/ploem.html | Article = [[Johan Sebastiaan Ploem]] | Portion = One image from the source | Low resolution = Yes | Purpose = To depict the subject of the article | Replaceability = Ploem is 95 years old at the time of upload, and no CC photo is available | Other information = Reduction of resolution was done in Inkscape by imposing 80 dpi in the PNG export. The resulting image visibly contains less fine details compared with the original image. }}

As you can see the resolution of the image was reduced, and also no CC image is available of Ploem and he is 95 years old at the time of writing. This rationale seems similar to for example this image uploaded by Materialscientist which has a similar rationale and is approved for use on the WP page of the subject shown in the image.

Perhaps it would allowed in the WP namespace through the Wikipedia:File upload wizard? Or is the problem that the resolution should be reduced further? - Blue.painting (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

In short: Commons:Fair use. Fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. It can only be hosted on the project where the material is directly used, provided the project has an exemption-policy, such as :en. en:File:John Albrechtson.jpg is hosted on :en.--Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Ok I see, thank you for your reply Túrelio. Best, - Blue.painting (talk) 10:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Gaetano Calabrò File/Photo

Hi Turelio, thanks for the message on Prof Calabrò, but that photo was given to me by the daughter of G. Calabrò who wanted me to insert it, photo at the University of Rome, previously Prof Sasso had been placed on her page, which clearly does not correspond at all to that of Prof . Enrico corradini (talk) 12:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Enrico,

I had tagged it because to me it looked like a real photography that had been run through a paint-filter. Anyway, we need to put it through the OTRS-permission process, which is rather easy. Please ask said daughter whether she is able (is it her own work?) and willing to formally release this image under a free license. If she agrees, please prepare a permission-text for her by copying the boxed text at Commons:Modello_richiesta_di_permesso#Pubblicazione_con_licenza_libera, enter the filename (or full URL) and the choosen license. Then send her the completed permission-text and ask her to read it and then sign and date it, and to send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Her email will not be made public. --Túrelio (talk) 21:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

One question...

Is this logo fake? I've checked that both the Nokia default website and the Nokia phones website dosen't use that logo. WaterExplorer (talk) 21:49, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Hard to say. I checked Nokia website for a collection of their logos, but found only one[2]. Anyway, the immediate source-page[3] states "tentative" for this logo. So, yes we can assume it's not really a Nokia-logo. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

I am The copyright Owner of this File:Segun Nabi.jpg

I am The copyright Owner of this File:Segun Nabi.jpg.jpg why will some body say they own it i snap it with camera myself please help me get my file back Realdbeat (talk) 07:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

The metadata of this image contains the statement "copyright: O.J-Dipson-Productions". So, are you acting on behalf of said O.J-Dipson-Productions? --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

no i upload the file myself without any metadata Realdbeat (talk) 09:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

It doesn't help to hide the evidence. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

how do i drop evidence Realdbeat (talk) 20:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

I need some help…

Hey, Túrelio. I’ve accidently found this category. A lot of its images are uploaded from the Flickr account “Coletivo Resistência”. This account has been uploading photos from Ricardo Stuckert, the official photographer of the president of Brazil, Lula. As far as I’m concerned, he doesn’t license his photos under any license accepted by Commons. So it should be a case to delete them due to copyvio, but I still don’t know how to nominate that many pictures. I would also like your opinion on the matter, if possible. Sorry for anything… RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi RodRabelo7,

in such case I would recommend to open a regular DR for 1 image out of this series and then copy the DR-template that has been created for the pilot-image onto all other files. If the latter sounds too much work, you could also put the above mentioned category into the DR-discussion with a statement like "This also applies to all files in category ...", provided the copyright-status is identical for all files in the category. Did you check whether there is an official Flickr-account of the president of Brazil, where these image might also be hosted under a different license? --Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Nimrat Khaira.jpg

I have taken copyright di permission before uploading the file. What incomplete permission are you talking about? Bermuda9999 (talk) 10:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

No idea what you want to say. In general: content on Facebook is not automatically under a free license. Only the creator/copyright-holder can release his/her work under a free license. You need to provide evidence for the claimed free license. Aso, photographer i not the depicted lady, but Ravan Khosa (per watermark).--Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Mypictures.jpg

How is this in scope? Uhai (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

It's a church building and we have even a few more images of that church. Of course, the filename is nonsense and should be changed. Also, a number of uploads from the same user had nonsense-descriptions, though the images are usable. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Interesting you see a church. I am seeing this (a selfie of a guy outdoors), even after clearing my browser cache. Not sure what's going on. Uhai (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Strange. It's the same church as File:Our beloved church.jpg. By the way: do you have any idea about what this "campaign" is: Category:Uploaded via Campaign:Brent through your heart? --Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

I have no idea, sorry! Uhai (talk) 10:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Professor E. Tendayi Achiume SPEAKING.webp

Hello Túrelio. Would you please undelete c:File:Professor E. Tendayi Achiume SPEAKING.webp on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Tendayi_Achiume? The picture is used under fair use with appropriate credit. I have checked with Professor Achiume, the subject of the article. 169.159.177.221 06:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Humphreytheodorek (if that is you), the problem is that Commons is (legally) not allowed to host fair-use material; see Commons:Fair use. Fair-use images need to be uploaded locally, i.e. on the project where they are to be used, provided that project has an exemption-policy, such as :en-Wikipedia (en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline). --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Duplicates of DOCUMERICA photographs

Hey Túrelio. As you must have noticed by now, I have started tagging duplicates of the DOCUMERICA files. My estimate is that there are hundreds if not thousands of duplicate files (Commons search). Is there anything I can do to make your and other contributors' work easier? Should I limit myself to a number of duplicates per day? Cheers. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Cryptic-waveform,

1st question: I don't really think so. For quite a number of the target-files, I found that they had a empty line on top of the description-template, which I manually deleted before the final go-click. But, if you are not actually editing the target-files, it wouldn't make sense to perform a separate editing-process only for that.

2nd question: that is not necessary, as duplicates are in a separate speedy-queue and thereby do hinder the speedy deletion of more urgent files, such as copyvios. If there are too many of them, it might only take some time until they are all processed.

--Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. I'll go for it and find as many duplicates as I can. I apologize in advance for any false positives that may slip in. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 02:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Duplicates

Hi I'm not sure if that was an exact duplicate. I see version differences between kept and probably deleted. Also the tint of the paper differs. The description mentions 3 versions, Search on commons results in 2 versions now. But it could have been their mistake, possibly corrected later on. IDK. MfG Peli (talk) 18:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, actually I waited for several days before performing this request. I even checked the serial# of the original drawing, which were identical (58), as I had the same impression. It's no problem to undelete. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi thanks for temp undeleting so i could compare. I made a comparision gallery on the file page. The manuscript lines show differences: "1e staat" vs. "2e staat" bottom right. And tint of paper differs clearly. Plus the deleted file was from a different donation to the museum. Can it be permanently undeleted please? Obvious error (by very new nominator). I don't understand their persistence to nominate this file again. Thousands of very similar but absolutely different versions wouid have to go. In cat pugs in art we might not need 3 samples. But we keep these to document art history - collections of art works by museum. I know you understand this. Thanks. Peli (talk) 00:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Ultima cancellazione

Ciao, scusa, io avevo messo la tabella dei diritti, l'unico problema è che non riuscivo a farla funzionare. Credevo che un amministratore l'avrebbe aggiustato, al posto di cancellarlo, e infatti avevo scritto a @Ruthven. Che motivo c'era di cancellarlo? Beaest (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, are you talking about File:Beatrice d'Este accoglie il messo pontificio, dalla pellicola "Lucrezia Borgia" di Lorenzo Onorati.png? If yes, you had tagged it by yourself as non-free content (fair use). However, fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Pensavo fosse possibile perché ho visto alcune foto simili, ma forse è possibile caricarle solo nella Wikipedia nazionale, ossia italiana nel mio caso, così: File:Schulmädchen-Report 7.png - Wikipedia

Correggimi se sbaglio. Beaest (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

No, see Commons:Fair use. Of course, it happens every now and then that users copy such kind of images from local (Wikipedia) to Commons, though they are warned not to do so, and it may then take some time until these images are detected and deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Ho capito, grazie mille per l'aiuto. Beaest (talk) 22:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

An unusual DR, possibly

Please have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Murexia xenochromus specimen.jpg, which is very early in its life. I would just like to know is this is the correct way to flag a possible hoax. I have no competence to judge whether it is or is not a hoax. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 23:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Let's wait for the :en-discussion. However, after another user found from where this image was "photoshopped" it's more likely a hoax. For now, I've tagged the file with an additional "fact"-warning-template. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

I think waiting is wise. I nominated it "procedurally" rather than from any position of knowledge. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

This has been quite a voyage of discovery. Thank you for all of your help. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Edit request

Can you please briefly undelete File:Николай Николаевич Боголюбов (портрет).jpg and edit the author section to note that the photo is by Mark Redkin (1908-1987) then re-delete it? Thank you!--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Baudenkmäler

Hallo Turelio! Wie ist das eigentlich bei Baudenkmälern? Ich habe bis jetzt immer nur eine neue Categorie angelegt, wenn ich mind. 2 Fotos hatte, und auch buildings in..........., und cultural heritage monuments in ............. darunter geschrieben. Aber jetzt hat das ein Wikipedianer gelöscht, für 1 Foto eine neue Categorie angelegt, die nur die Adresse beinhaltet. Grüße Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 11:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, ich schaue später mal darauf. Gibst du mir noch das Link für die gelöschte cat durch. --Túrelio (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Turelio, Kiensee 2.jpg ist die Überschrift. Da hat ein Wikipedianer schon zum 2. Mal, nachdem ich es gelöscht hatte, das Buildings in Bad Heilbrunn und das CHM in Bad Heilbrunn wieder gelöscht, und Bauernhaus Kiensee 2 als Categorie darunter geschrieben. Ich habe aber gesehen, daß das Foto trotzdem noch in beiden Categorien vorhanden ist. Stattdessen gibt es jetzt eine globale Dateiverwendung mit diesem Namen. Das hat mich total irritiert! Außerdem noch die Tatsache, daß das bei nur 1 Foto gemacht wird. Aber wahrscheinlich wollte dieser fleißige Wikipedianer dieses Bauernhaus besonders in den Fokus rücken. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 09:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

@Edelmauswaldgeist, sorry dass es so lange gedauert hat. Ich habe heute etwas ähnliches bei einem Foto von Prof. Loogen erlebt, File:Loogen1984OleBreithardtfecit.jpg. Ich hatte dafür keine eigene Kategorie angelegt, nach der "alten Regel". Nun hat jemand doch eine eigene Kategorie Category:Franz Loogen angelegt und die ganzen Detailkategorien, in denen bislang das Bild einsortiert war, dorthin verschoben. Das geht für mich aber in Ordnung, weil der Effekt ja derselbe ist, ob in den Detailkategorien nun direkt das Foto oder halt die Namenskategorie des Abgebildeten steckt. Möglicherweise ist diese Strategie eine Auswirkung der zunehmenden Übernahme von Strukturen von WikiData nach Commons.

Was dein Bild File:Kiensee 2.jpg angeht, sind diese Kategorie-Änderungen ja von einem langjährigen deutschsprachigen Benutzer, User:Reinhardhauke, vorgenommen worden. Den kannst du problemlos auch direkt ansprechen, dass er dir kurz erklärt warum er das so gemacht hat. --Túrelio (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Image

Hi,

I noticed you deleted the file File:AndrewTateSextape.webp. Thanks for doing so, for an obvious reason, but I noticed in your edit summary you said "delete and salt". The page is currently not protected. Please do so.

Thanks! Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 21:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

hmm. Apart from the fact that "salting" isn't fail-proof, I prefer to leave the filename as sort of honey-pot. I've it on my watch-list and will be notified, when the file is recreated. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Non-responsive user to send permissions to VRT

Hi. I've asked a user to send permissions for images, they've attached a link to non-accessible Google Drive share and removed the No-permission-since tags. What are the next steps here? User talk:Chennai Super Kings Lover#Permissions. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I've re-tagged them and left a note on his talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

About yhe Photo

Here Then how to upload the public figures photo for biography? as if the photo is necessary for Article. Nrshaown (talk) 08:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

You need to find a photo that was evidently released under a Commons-compatible free license (COM:L) by its photographer. Being on Facebook or other social medial does NOT mean it's freely licensed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Vanessa 1.jpg

Looking over the license history on Flickr it appears that the uploader marked it as both both CC BY 2.0 and all rights reserved at the same time multiple times. Then they eventually just changed it to all rights reserved. Which makes me think they didn't know what they doing. Whatever the bot says I don't think you can justify it being CC BY 2.0 if that's clearly not the term the person intended it to be licensed under. IMO the bot doesn't override common sense or the facts either. In this case the person clearly didn't know what they doing and landed on all rights reserved once they figured it out. So I'd appreciated it if you just deleted the file. At least per the precautionary principle if nothing else. Obviously no one is going to win a copyright case if it ever goes there by basing their defense on the judgements of a bot. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 08:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Well, so far, what I did is our current practise. And simply tracelessly deleting an image that was on Commons since 2010 is a good solution. However, as uploads from this Flickr-account have been reviewed in 3 different ways (bot, admin, reviewer), I will put this up as a question to the community in this moment. I suggest you to wait with the file at hand until this is discussed, and then put it up again in a regular DR, so that, in case it gets deleted, there remains a trace, which shows that it wasn't a plain copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

OK. That's fine. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:35, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

See Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#legal_question. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Not to beat a dead horse, but I'm kind of interested now. Say I accidently click CC BY 2.0 or whatever CC license when I upload a file and then I change it to something else later once I realize the mistake. Am I then stuck with it being licensed under the terms of the CC since me using that license for the image is permanently in the files edit history? --Adamant1 (talk) 08:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Not exactly. When you upload your own work to Flickr erroneously under a free license, which you realize only shortly after it has been transferred to Commons (with record of the then free license), per the nonrevokable doctrine of CC, you cannot prevent others to use your image from Commons. When you realize your wrong licensing on Flickr immediately/soon and change it accordingly, then it's highly unlikely that it has already been transferred to Commons, so the problem wouldn't occur. I mean, it's important to remember that publishing a work under a free license is a legal act.--Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

That sounds reasonable, I guess. Although it seems a little weird to predicate the whole thing on if it's been transferred to Commons yet since the legalities of the licensing terms have nothing to do with where the file is or isn't being hosted at the time. Like if the person wrongly uploaded the image to Flickr as public domain, it was transferred to Commons under that license and then it turned not to be PD, you can't just be like "to bad. It was transferred to Commons as public domain so it's public domain." --Adamant1 (talk) 09:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Of course, as there is Flickr-washing, one needs to be rather sure that the account-holder was legally entitled (i.e., own work, not even a derivative) to release it under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Liste

Hilfeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Habe gestern auf die Liste der jüdischen Friedhöfe in Deutschland mühsam Bilder von bayrischen jüdischen Friedhöfen hochgeladen. Jetzt sind die aber alle in der Rubrik "Bemerkungen" gelandet. Es gibt aber auch keine Rubrik für Bilder! Da wollte ich etwas produktives machen, und habe alles durcheinander gebracht. Wie mache ich das jetzt? Viele Grüße Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Bitte mal mind. eins der betroffenen Bilder hier verlinken. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@Edelmauswaldgeist, kann es sein, dass du dich hier auf die Wikipedia beziehst (und nicht auf Commons). --Túrelio (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Ganz richtig! z.b. File:AmbergJüdischerFriedhof 06.JPG. File:Jüdischer Friedhof Ansbach10.jpg. Du mußt nur mal "Liste der jüdischen Friedhöfe in Deutschland Wikipedia" eintippen, dann findest du bei der bayerischen Liste das gesammte Schlamassel, aus dem ich jetzt nicht mehr herausfinde. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh je. Tabellenprogrammierung in MediaWiki ist eine mittlere Katastrophe. Da kann ich nicht wirklich helfen. Was mich nur wundert: bei den anderen Bundesländern gibt es in der Liste überhaupt keine Fotos. Gehören die Bayern-Friedhof-Fotos vielleicht einfach nicht in die Liste? Falls das so sein sollte, könntest du doch einfach deine Edits, mit denen du die Fotos eingefügt hattest, wieder rückgängig machen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Es wäre sehr schade, wenn durch das Löschen meine ganze Arbeit umsonst gewesen wäre. Außerdem gibt es wie in der Liste beschrieben viele Friedhöfe in Bayern. Mir ist auch schon aufgefallen, daß nirgends Fotos sind. Deshalb wollte ich mir da die Arbeit machen. Jetzt versuche ich es mal über das Forum, vielleicht finde ich da Hilfe. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Selbstversorgung im Garten

Ich verstehe nicht, warum Túrelio den Löschantrag gestellt hat. Diese Fotografie ist von mir und ich widerspreche dem Löschansinnen. KUGerhardt (talk) 10:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@KUGerhardt, dann kommentiere im LA Commons:Deletion requests/File:Selbstversorgung im Garten.jpg, wo übrigens auch die Begründung steht. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your deletion of the image I uploaded

You have deleted an image that I have uploaded.

deleted page File:20220827 B.I 1st Fan Meeting in Manila 3.jpg (Copyright violation: No indication that image is licensed freely on tweet nor on the author's profile description https://twitter.com/dearLynnne/status/1566822341409026048)

The author of the picture has already sent the email with the permission. I have added subst:op to the file to let the VRT team know that permission is on the way, but another editor has reverted my changes saying, "refrain from adding any templates, as it's not permissible, given you are not a member of the VRT". They were clearly wrong.

I'm very unhappy that I wasn't notified before you deleted this file. What's the resolution here now? Bostonite01310 (talk) 14:33, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

I now realize that I have been notified by a different editor. But it was the middle of the night for me and I did not get a chance to respond before it got deleted. Two of my files have now been deleted, even though the copyright holder sent an email with written permission to VRT as soon as I uploaded the images.

File:20220827 B.I 1st Fan Meeting in Manila 15.jpg

File:20220827 B.I 1st Fan Meeting in Manila 3.jpg

Bostonite01310 (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

@Bostonite01310, I hadn't seen the "permission-pending-template", as it had been removed, which I think was a bit excessive. Anyway, the images can easily be restored, when the volunteer (OTRS) who deals with the permission, says it's o.k. They can either notify me or put it on an admin-board. So, do not re-upload the images, the originals will be restored, if permission is ok. --Túrelio (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio: If I'm being honest this whole process has been quite excruciating for me. An editor (a VRT team member no less) with insufficient knowledge got into an incorrect argument with me in the middle of my night for hours. I thought I had it settled but when I woke up in the morning my files got deleted. I'm not on Wikipedia round the clock. I go to work or sleep like a normal person. I do edits on Wikipedia for fun. This experience has been the opposite of it. Bostonite01310 ^talk 20:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry about that. But remember, we are all volunteers here, Admins (as me) as well as the OTRS/VRT-people. Besides, you are not obliged to immediately reply to a mail from OTRS, as people here live in different time-zones all over the world. If you are new here, a deleted image may look as a desaster, but it is not. It takes an admin 2 clicks to restore it. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

St Peris' Church

Please reverse your deletion of the redirect at Category:St Peris' Church, Llanberis.

A number of images exist, such as File:St. Peris Church Llanberis Wales.jpg, which refer to the church by that name, as do external sources.

The redirect should be to Category:St Peris's Church, Nantperis. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Ok. The redir-target was wrong and thereby red. --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Sigh. The target was moved, without leaving a redirect. All good now. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Removal of image Z1151 and copyrighting Z1152

I just found out that you removed the image Z1151.JPG i uploaded and copyright marked Z1152.JPG, I’ve allready emailed the volunteers but would like to ask why they were marked at all as I was given the images from the archive with the express permission of using them for Wikipedia and marked them as such as was requested from me. with regards ThatArmyDude (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

I am not aware of any file with such a name. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Ah, you probably meant File:WAGR Z1151.jpg and File:WAGR Z1152.jpg. Next time please provide proper filenames. You were in advance notified about the problems on your talkpage: User talk:ThatArmyDude.

The 1st one was sourced from https://www.railheritagewa.org.au/ and credited to some K. Raynes; no evidence of a free license.

The 2nd one is sourced from https://www.railheritagewa.org.au/ and credited to WAGR; no evidence of a free license. In addition, your 2 source-links don't lead to the image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Any file to do with Hamis Kiggundu needs scrutiny

Thank you for your measured approach on a couple of the latest uploads. These enwiki SPIs will interest you, because they show an ever increasing sock farm surrounding the gentleman. I've been tracking edits in this area for more than a couple of years now, and find that they always need scrutiny. I've responded to the D you created for one of the two recent ones. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 10:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

OMG, this is really a long SP-list.:-( --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Global rollbacker

Hello, can I patrol edits and new file on Commons via the Global rollback tool? Thanks! Tryvix1509 (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, honestly, I don't know. However, exactly 1 month ago Kadı gave you rollbacker-right on Commons. If you want to patrol edits and/or new uploads, which is a very welcome task, please request it at Commons:Requests for rights#Patroller. --Túrelio (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, Kadı gave me rollbacker right for revert vandalism purpose, but now I have the global rollbacker tool, which have the global patrolmarks and autopatrol right. So I just want to ask again to confirm if it is legal for me to use this patrol tool on Commons. Tryvix1509 (talk) 14:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

I assume, if somebody obtained the technical right to do something, this should automatically include the "permission" to use it. By the way, to patrol files, if not done in an intentionally bad manner, is always good in itself and is an important task. Rollback should be used with more caution, according to the rules. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

File delation without asking about (Ticket Ticket:202211)

During the past month and also this month I have been exchanging emails about the copyright of different images uploaded by me, until I proved ownership of them. No one asked me about this particular photo. Before deleting it, and given that it was included in an article and was quite representative, I think it would have been better to ask me about. The photo is my own work. It was made by my mother and she died more than 10 years ago. Could you tell me what is the problem?MorenaClara (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

No idea about which file you are talking. (I've performed 250+ deletions today) --Túrelio (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh, likely it is File:Telar antiguo para confeccionar espolines.jpg. It had been tagged for deletion by OTRS-agent Ganímedes for "Impossible to verify authorship." --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, that is the one (I included the tickect number). Then, what can I do? It is my mums work and now it is mine. I was in the original picture and cut off myself. She died, as mentioned. Ganimedes did not contact me about that picture as she did with others. Any suggestion? Thank you. MorenaClara (talk) 16:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

You need to talk to Ganimedes or OTRS. I am not an OTRS-volunteer, so I don't have any access to OTRS-communication.(therefore the ticket# didn't help me to find the filename) Probably you need to convince them that you are the heir of your mother's work/copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I thought you were an OTRS-volunteer, I was confused. I will try to contact her. MorenaClara (talk) 20:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Sports logos

Hi!

Firstly, thank you for deleting the Kaohsiung Steelers logo. I was unaware of the high quality rule at the time, but it makes sense from a copyright perspective. Second, I want to ask how it would be possible to add a logo to the wikipedia article. I can see them in the NBA team's pages, euroleague team pages, and it just adds to the page quality, it makes it easily recognizeable. So, any suggestions, svg format or another platform instead of wikimedia commons (they dont allow logos) maybe? Thanks for your hard work and time! MrSplashman77 (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi MrSplashman77,

if you want to add it to :en-Wikipedia, you could upload the logo locally at :en and then claim it as fair-use (en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline). If you want to use it on a Wikipedia, which has no exemption-policy, then you might ask a user from Taiwan if he/she could look whether the logo is permanently displayed/installed somewhere outdoors and then take a photo of it and upload it to Commons, claiming freedom-of-panorama. If that is not possible, then you need to ask the Kaohsiung Steelers directly of they are willing to release the logo under Commons-compatible free license. --Túrelio (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, please undone delete of File:River-Plate.svg this is the logo of a public football team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARO III (talk • contribs) 18:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi ARO III, being a "public football team" has no relevance for copyright. The logo was sourced to https://cariverplate.uy, which carries the note "© Copyright 2019 Club Atletico River Plate", whereas the uploader claimed it to be under CC-license, but did not provide eny evidence for that. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Gerda Thune Andersen

Hi, according to this file these are made by Gerda Thune Andersen: File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque C. G. Schultz.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Else Roesdahl.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Holger Schmidt.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Olaf Olsen.ajb.jpg and File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Sv. Søndergaard.ajb.jpg. Due to the no FOP in Denmark for art and her not being dead yet, or at least not long enough for them to be free, the files should be nominated. Since they're from the same artist, is the nomination supposed to be a single request, or does one make one for each? TherasTaneel (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

You can combine them into 1 DR. When I want to do this, I start the DR-script for 1 file, and then simply copy the resulting template from the processed file to all the other files and add their filenames to the DR-page. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Hmm, I think... I know what you mean, but what about the notification to the uploader, they would only get one, do I add the other files as a list underneath in the same section or use the template for each? TherasTaneel (talk) 19:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Ah, if the files are from different uploaders, then you need to click on the template on the affected files and copy the uploader-notification-link and paste it on the uploader's talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion

Hi, if you have time, could you clear out the above category? I tend to put all the poor Fleuron-related images in there, they're simply not worth any more effort. I'm not sure if anyone else uses it. Thanks in advance. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I'll look into it early next week. --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:CrownGeolinaMagna KaiserinWPAC.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

SVG conversion

Hi. I'm wondering if this SVG File:Seal of the City of Salatiga.svg is a valid conversion from File:Lambang Kota Salatiga.png. There're a great deal of changes. I don't see any modifications on the cite website https://salatiga.go.id/tentang-salatiga/lambang-daerah/ Pinging uploader RaFaDa20631 for any inputs -- DaxServer (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Updated: I updated the arms on 18 February 2023 as a part of evaluations/corrections among coats of arms of regencies in Java. The original citation/reference is a law/regulation document titled 1997 Regional Regulation No. 5 (Peraturan Daerah Kotamadya Dati II Salatiga No. 5 Tahun 1997, documented at JDIH Kota Salatiga) as I mentioned before... RaFaDa20631 (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Walkie T на баттле против Изтолпы.png

What's wrong with the file? same CC license. Нейроманьяк (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

You are correct. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

File deletion

Hi~ why the "なぞクー「Goo」" pictures deleted? even Mysterious Qoo did not appear in the introduction of friends on the official website, but Mysterious Qoo is a official character that did appeared in the past. Here are three ads that which Mysterious Qoo's appeared：

①CM 「镜にうつったのは......」(なぞクーWEB篇) (2004年6月) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfVRy0R0Ddk ②CM 「镜にうつったのは......」(なぞクーグッズキャンペーン編) (2004年) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEuQzLgDGFE ③CM「Qooの乳酸カシス子汁」篇（2005年3月24日）https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvdJj71OGIs Tamiacoco (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Christian Holst Vigilius, 2022.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:Christian Holst Vigilius, 2022.jpg when you have the chance? This file has the same name as a file you deleted on December 11, 2022, as a copyvio, but I don't think it's the same file. However, I'm also not too sure that the uploader's claim of "own work" is valid either since the EXIF data for the new reference is the kind that often comes from photos downloaded from Facebook. Most of this uploader's uploads are fairly high photos of Danish politicians being claimed as "own work". There's almost never any EXIF data or source information provided to help verify any such claim. That fact that first version uploaded of this file (i.e. the one you deleted) seems to have also been uploaded as "own work" even though it was clearly attributed to someone else and most likely came from some website makes me a bit concerned that the uploader might just be not being sufficiently diligent when it comes things like COM:Own work and COM:NETCOPYVIO. They might mistakenly think that downloading a file from somewhere online somehow means they now own the copyright on the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Anders Stjernholm, 2017.jpg is the most recent file uploaded by this user. Its EXIF data also suggest it comes from Facebook and the EXIF data actually attributes to the file to "Roberto Borgen Fb.com/RobertoCapture". Unless that can be verified by VRT to be the uploader, it seem the uploader is simply taking photos from online and uploading them to Commons regardless of their copyright status. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Please help delete my image,thank you

Hi,I have appeared on camera as of 2022. There is a racy picture that I intended to be for study purposes only but it appears when I google in the google picture bar the name Arijana Neskovic. Can you go to my page and delete it,its a girl with black hair and breasts in a trenchoat. I also do not want the picture to appear with my name during google picture search.Thank you,Ariana You can go to my page and see the picture. ArijanaNeskovicBrajic (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Can you check it?

Hey, Túrelio. Sorry for disturbing you, but would you mind checking if this image is a copyright violation? The filename, the Exif… everything gives me that feeling. There’s also a personal photo in the file’s history. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Opened a DR. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Pál Esterházy (1843–1898)

Thank you for the very quick deletion! :-)) Bizottmány (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright of photos

Hey Túrelio. I've uploaded a couple of photos (including File:Jack P Crowther.jpg, File:Joe E. Hollingsworth, 1961.jpg, and File:Donald D. Lorenzen, 1958.jpg, for example) and seen some photos uploaded by other users (for example, File:Roy Lawrence Donley family portrait circa 1923.jpg, File:Andrew Boyle Workman-c1925.jpg, and File:Francisco Miranda, Billy Sweeney, and Councilman Edward R. Roybal.jpg, for example) that aren't immediately clear if they're been published. From what I understand now, they have to be published for them to use templates like PD-US-expired, PD-US-no notice, and PD-US-not renewed. If I can't find anything that points to them being previously published, should they be deleted? Thanks. reppop^talk 22:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi Reppop,

I don't have special expertise wrt U.S. copyright terms. For images claimed to be published between 1928 and 1977, such as File:Jack P Crowther.jpg, they have to be published without a copyright-note. The "publication" at TESSA can hardly count to fulfil this requirement, as existet hardly before 1978 and also mentions the photographer, which probably counts as "copyright note", though I am ot sure about the latter. So, if your own search doesn't yield proof of publication, fulfilling the mentioned requirements, you might open a regular DR, eventually a collective one including images in an identical situation (for example, shot in the 1950/60s), and ask for comment. Eventually other contributors may find evidence of publication (w/o copyright-note). --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Seed Catalog..

Thanks - I was going through all the items I had tagged, and updating the licenses. User_talk:Fæ#File:Summer_and_fall,_1948_(IA_summerfall194819jste).pdf

Any chance you could assist in reviewing these as well? (see also my contributions from this morning.)... 09:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi ShakespeareFan00,

I stumbled on these files when working on the speedy-queues. Currently I have not enough time to work on the complete batch of these files, as it requires to scroll through all pages of each pdf. As they are not urgent, you could just leave them in the queue. In some time they will be processed by my admin-colleagues. --Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

No worries, I estimate I should clear my reviews later this afternoon. Do you mind if I take a look at other PDF tagged as copyvio, as I have some spare time? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

As I assume you know what you are doing, just go on. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Question

Hey, Túrelio, may you help me out with these two images? They’re marked as valued, but apparently they were simply cropped from the real valued image: this and this. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

dupliate undeletion request

Hi Túrelio, Hope you're well, Could you undelete File:1995 Ford Liata (49679009402).jpg please as it wasn't a duplicate - the live file was a crop of the original file that you deleted, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. On first view the images look identical, on second view I've detected the difference in the upper part. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Hey Túrelio, Great minds think alike - I noticed this too when declining their first request, I'll rename the file to say it's cropped to avoid confusement, Thank you for undeleting this, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Image

Túrelio why did you delete my image? LatosTheFifth (talk) 14:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, as you had re-uploaded an image, which had been deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bela Lugosi as Count Dracula 1931.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 15:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

I found and downloaded that image from dvdbeaver.com and decided to make it full screen. LatosTheFifth (talk) 15:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

That an image is somewhere in the web does not mean it's under a free license, which is a requirement for any upload to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Can't you upload it? LatosTheFifth (talk) 15:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

You did not understand what I wrote or what it means. Any upload to Commons has to be as free as required per COM:L. Only the original author/creator can release an image under a free license or if an image is old enough it may fall into the public domain. It has nothing to do with who uploads it. --Túrelio (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

So my favorite images can't exist can they? LatosTheFifth (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Noting Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#User:LatosTheFifth. Belbury (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Please ignore that. LatosTheFifth (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

File:New Goa International Airport's Logo.jpg

Hi Túrelio. I'm wondering if the coloring of the shape in the logo https://www.newgoaairport.com/images/goa-logo.svg is under TOO. Seem normal color gradients but I don't know if gradients are covered by TOO. If so, replacing that jpg with svg is better. Do we delete the jpg and upload svg separately or upload svg as a new version to this one? -- DaxServer (talk) 09:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

uui, that's a difficult question. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India#Threshold of originality one might assume that it's below TOO. But, that's just a layman's interpretation. You might put that question on COM:VP.

Wrt your 2nd question: as the jpeg-file looks rather bad, compared to the original, I would request it for deletion, once the svg is there. And, no, as the file-format is different, one cannot upload the svg as a new version of the jpeg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

I see thanks. BTW, What's "uui" ? -- DaxServer (talk) 10:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Might be replaced by . --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

LD_1 -> LD_01

Can you do this redirect in reverse? There are 48 other files in the set with the exact form of 'LD_##.pdf'. Thanks. Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 16:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. That one file was definitely my mess. Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 23:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Bath City images

Hi mate, a lot of the Bath City files that I have requested to be deleted are not in use. They are poorly cropped/edited duplicates of the original image, which I did myself. If possible, please could you delete the images that are no in use? That would be great, thanks. Joseph1891 (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Sure. But, File:Bath City squad in 1913 taken at the Belvoir Castle Ground.jpg is in use. One other I've duplicate-deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Oh yeah you’re right! Sorry I thought I changed that one for the clearer one! Thanks for letting me no, feel free to delete this one, I’ll replace it with the clearer one :) Thanks. 👍Joseph1891 (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

I’ll put the speedy deletion template for all the images that need to be deleted if that’s okay. Joseph1891 (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Most have been processed now. File:Bath City F.C. Squad 1913.png should be kept for historic purposes, as it's the "original" report. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Temporary undeletion

Howdy! I'm BusterD, and en.wiki admin and I'd like to view the File:Menē Inc. certificate of authenticity offered with all jewelry.jpg. I am researching a user I believe has violated policy as it regards connected (perhaps paid) editing. Would you allow me to see it for 24 hours? Thanks! BusterD (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

@BusterD, there you are. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

As it turns out the uploader has been blocked for sockpuppetry and possible UPE. Thank you for your kind assistance. If I can ever help you, please ask. BusterD (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Another revision to hide

Hi Túrelio. Thanks for deleting the picture change revision on File:Marcial Gómez Balsera.jpg. There is another one to do here: File:Mer av Svegs centrum.jpg. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello!

I think I marked an empty file for deletion and you deleted it. I now however saw in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abhandlung von den Zähnen (Pfaff) 227.jpg that the file page was intentionally left blank so to not destroy the link chain. So you can undelete the file. Jonteemil (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. You can probably undelete the talk page as well so it won't be nominated again.Jonteemil (talk) 00:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Nicht Copyvio, sondern Dublett

Guten Tag, bei dem Bild File:Conventia PD-L 2013 - Monica Macovei 1-scaled.jpg und den TinEye-Ergebnissen handelt es sich um Kopien von File:Conventia PD-L 2013 - Monica Macovei (1).jpg. Viele Grüße, --Micha (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

@Dan Mihai Pitea, Danke für den Hinweis. Letztlich ist es aber auch eine copyvio, weil Ninhursag3 das Foto als "own work" deklariert und damit die CC-Lizenz des Originalfotos ungültig gemacht hat. --Túrelio (talk) 13:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag removal

Regarding File:Barco_SRL_foto_wiki2.jpg, the original uploader appears to be a spam account, who was blocked on EN Wikipedia for making self-promotional edits on the same day they made the upload. With this in mind, would the image still fall under G10 even if it remains in use? Loafiewa (talk) 14:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Loafiewa,

on Commons we have the practise that an image, which we consider a bit questionable or out of COM:SCOPE, but which is used in the mainspace of an WMF-project, is kept (as long as it's used), provided it does not violate copyright or personality/privacy-rights. So, the proper way here would be to talk to the users on :es, where the image is used, about the problem and/or offer them a comparable picture. --Túrelio (talk) 15:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Bigg Boss Malayalam 5 Poster.jpg

Hi Túrelio. You tagged File:Bigg Boss Malayalam 5 Poster.jpg with {{Npd}}, but the uploader subsequently added a YouTube link as the source. The link they added doesn't work, but I think they were trying to add this. There's nothing on that YouTube page to indicate the file uploaded has been released as licensed. The uploader also is mucking around with the date of the npd template. This could be just a misunderstanding of how the template works or it could an attempt to game the process. Either way, it seem unlikely that they're going to be able to get anyone's consent for this file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly,

thanks for notifying. File deleted as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for checking on this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Isreal

hey. I am from Iran and I am very glad that you visited Isreal. Unfortunately I can't because our country are not Friends. Isreal is so awesome. Have you visited Iran yet?! Nsiamrahadi (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sorry no, as of yet I had no opportunity to visit Iran. --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Review

Hi @Túrelio good day, can you please review my uploads.Thanks Pp01902 (talk) 15:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. However, your last upload has no permission at the source. So, if the depicted lady is willing to release it under a free license, she should either put a note on Instagram or send an email from her official email-address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), confirming the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Kindly check the insta source again and you can find the permission info, File:Sonu Chandrapal.jpg. Hope this helps. Thanks Pp01902 (talk) 07:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Cabot Logo.png

Hi Túrelio. File:Cabot Logo.png is a reupload of File:CabotCreamery.jpg, but this time the uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder. I posted this on their English Wikipedia user talk page and tagged the latest upload with {{Npd}}, but I'll leave it to your discretion as to whether the latest upload should be deleted as a copyvio as well as a precaution until CONSENT can be VRT verified. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, IMO, they are are probably related to the company. So, I've directed them per email to your advise on the talkpage and I'll let the npd-process run regularly. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for looking at this. For reference, there account has been blocked on English Wikipedia, but that shouldn't stop them from emailing their consent to VRT if they want to do so. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Frédéric de Roos

Hello @Turelio. You have deleted File:Scan-brochure-20-ans-jazz-crb.jpg from our page because there would be a "Copyright infringement: non-free illustrations: record, CD cover". However, we are not only the author of the creation of the document but also the author of the scan. Could you please remove this so-called copyright violation so that we can put this document back into use ? Thank you in advance. Bib-crb (talk) 13:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bib-crb,

the brochure has 2 possibly copyrightable elements, the text portion and the graphic to the left. The copyright remains usually with the creator of the work. Making a scan of a work does not change that, i.e. the copyright is not transferred to the "scanner". Now, assuming that you might be a representative of the "Conservatoire royal de Bruxelles", the text of the brochure is likely in the copyright of the Conservatoire. But, who created the graphic? --Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Turelio. I understand. Indeed, the text is the property of the Conservatoire royal de Bruxelles. The design was created by Jean-Claude Salemi. Bib-crb (talk) 09:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Ok. So, as Jean-Claude Salemi seems to be alive, you need to ask his permission to release said brochure/cover with his work under the choosen free license. If you want to do this, I can temporarily restore the image-file on Commons. The confirmation should be sent directly from Mr. Salemi to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). It can also be in French, however, the specific image and the license need to be mentioned in it. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio. Jean-Claude Salemi's image was one that the Conservatory had commissioned. In 2007, we already had the rights to Jean-Claude Salemi to distribute posters, programmes and flyers. Why should it not be possible to reproduce the image since the rights were already requested and authorised at the time ? Bib-crb (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Uploads to Commons (policy COM:L) need to be under a free license that allows anybody to use it for any purpose, including commercial re-use. So, if your image is licensed under a CC-BY or CC-BY-SA license, anybody could crop the Salemi-graphic, print it on postcards or a coffee-cups and sell them. Please take this information to the legal department/counsel of the Conservatory and ask them/him/her whether such a release would be legitimate based on the terms of their contract with Jean-Claude Salemi. If they are sure it's yes, then the legal dep. should send said confirmation to OTRS, as explained above. --Túrelio (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of oldest upload djvu

Hello, Turélio.The File:Langevin - L’Aspect général de la théorie de la relativité, 1922.djvu at first upload (dated sept) missed 1 page. This has been corrected with a second upload (dated march). We notice at wikisource an irregularity. So, if you can delete the first upload of sept, 27, 2022, the index page will become correct at wikisource, I hope. --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Havang(nl),  Done. Hope it helped. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Ahmed El-Sakka 2020.png

Hi, this file is licensed under YouTube Audio Library. Should it be deleted? --Karim talk to me :)..! 11:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

What's "YouTube Audio Library"? At the YT-URL I see no evidence of a free license. However, as it was uploaded in 2021, the license on YT might have been changed. Now I've checked on archive.org; even in 2021 there was no free license[4]. --Túrelio (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Löschantrag

Hallo Turelio!Bei: File:Untermberg 5 Arzbach.jpg, Wackersberg Wiki, Buildings in Wackersberg, den Rest habe ich schon einmal gelöscht, haben sich die Hausbewohner beschwert, weil sie im Hintergrund zu sehen sind. Sie drohen mir auch mit rechtlichen Schritten, wennn das Bild nicht innerhalb von 3 Tagen verschwunden ist. Anleitungen zum Programm "Quick delete" habe ich nicht gefunden, also versuchte ich es mit "Löschantrag vorschlagen", was natürlich viel zu lange dauert. Da fiel mir ein, daß sich schon einmal jemand beschwert hat, weil sie ganz schwach im Hintergrund zu sehen war. Damals hat mir jemand damit geholfen, indem er die Person aus dem Foto gelöscht hat. Vielleicht könntest du das ja in diesem Bild mit den 3 Personen machen. Ich habe den Hausbewohnern schon mitgeteilt, daß ich einen Löschantrag gestellt habe. Wenn das aber alles zu schwierig ist, lösche einfach das ganze Bild, dann fahre ich wieder in diese Gegend wo noch einige Baudenkmäler zum fotografieren sind, und nehme das Haus ohne Personen nochmal auf. Vielen Dank Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 08:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Edelmauswaldgeist,

eine Retouche wäre hier m.E. zu aufwendig. Ich habe es deshalb direkt gelöscht, zumal ich keine externen Nachnutzungen gefunden habe. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Vielen Dank Turelio! Jetzt bin ich richtig erleichtert!!!!!!!! Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 08:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

The author suggested to quickly delete the image

I'm the author and I would like to delete it quickly image Dự thảo Bảng lương Sĩ quan Quân đội và Công an Việt Nam năm 2021. Because: I'm about to release a new version of the image but it's extracted from a .png file so I need to request that the old image be removed before I can post the new image. Please help me delete old pictures. Thank you. Taitamtinh (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Bitte

Guten Tag Túrelio,
darf ich heute mal wieder mit einer persönlichen Bitte an Dich herantreten.
Da ich sehr viele Seiten und Bilder öffne, werde ich besonders in letzter Zeit mit einer Unmenge von Wikipedia-Bannern und -Infos, ich sage es offen, genervt.
Meine Frage: Kann man diese Banner global ausschalten? und wäre es möglich, dass Du mir diese Funktion in mein Userkonto eingibst?
Ich wäre Dir sehr dankbar. Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 12:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC) P.S. ...offensichtlich ist mein Antiwerbebanner nicht o.k.

Hallo Orchi,

war seit Vormittag unterwegs. Mich nerven die Banner auch etwas; normalerweise reicht es für eine Sitzung, wenn man das Banner durch Klick auf das x schließt. Wie man das global oder zumindest projektweise ganz abschaltet, weiß ich leider nicht. Da müsste ich mich auch erst schlaumachen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Guten Tag Túrelio,

vielen Dank und hoffentlich Erfolg bei Deinem Mühen. Grüße Orchi (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Islatravir structure.svg

Hallo Túrelio,

warum hast du meine hochgeladene Sturkturformel (File:Islatravir structure.svg) gelöscht mit dem Hinweis, dass es ein Duplikat auf File:Test.svg wäre - Test.svg ist aber eine universelle Anlaufstelle, um svgs vorab zu testen (temporary file for testing whether SVG files will correctly render when uploaded on Commons.). Nachdem ich zufrieden war, habe ich dann unter korrektem Name die Strukturformel hochgeladen. Mittlerweile gibt es duztende andere test.svg-Versionen.

Daher bitte Islatravir structure.svg wiederherstellen. --Julius Senegal (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Julius, ein Duplikat-Bot hatte sie als Duplikat markiert. Hab sie wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Wunderbar, dankeschön. --Julius Senegal (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

File deletion (Michelle Akers entry)

Hello Túrelio, I saw your request for the deletion of said file, included in the Michelle Ankers entry here on wikipedia. Since I saw you were very keen to help check that the image is suitable for this site, I ask you if you would like to help me find a picture of her to put on her profile. It is very important for me that women in soccer are given recognizion and a picture on her Wikipedia entry would mean that. Sorry about the non-technical language, I am new on Wikipedia. Saludos! SANDIACELESTIAL (talk) 07:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi SANDIACELESTIAL,

as Commons accepts only uploads that are verifiable freely licensed (per COM:L) by its creator, you need to search for such images. A fertile place for that might be flickr.com. If even a thorough search doesn't yield any usable image, you might either try to contact Michelle Ankers and ask her whether she would be able to provide a freely licensed image of herself, or, if you want to use the image only on :en-Wikipedia, you may claim a not freely licensed image under the fair-use exception. The latter cannot be uploaded to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Disney characters

Disney frequently sues for their copyright, so... shouldn't all of those in the Category:Disney characters on stamps and subcategories (perhaps even some of the parent categories) be looked at? TherasTaneel (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for notifying. However, I am not a specialist for the intricacies of U.S. copyright. I recommend to put that question at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Antalya waterfalls

Greetings. The file you falsely accused me for copyrights violation, comes from my device. Please, restore the file. Thank you. GreatBernard (talk) 21:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you are correct. The patroler, who had tagged the image as copyvio-suspected, wrongly thought that the images were identical, which is not the case. Sorry.  Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Deleted Category

Hello @Túrelio, I wanted to create a category for an entity, but I realized that it had been deleted by you before.

The category is "Category:Mina Luna". I am a new here and I don't seems to know the reason for the deletion, so i would like to know all that concern the category and if I can recreate it Dcraigo (talk) 13:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Dcraigo,

the cat had been deleted as it had been tagged by another user as "duplicate" of Category:Mina Luna Vincent. However, the latter doesn't exist. So, you may decide by yourself whether cat:Mina Luna Vincent or cat:Mina Luna would be more appropriate and then (re-)create it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Túrelio

I have checked both cat:Mina Luna Vincent and cat:Mina Luna, both have been deleted, and I am not sure if any of them can be restored or i can just go ahead and recreate it. If they can't be restored, can you provide me with an article that can guide me on category creation?

Thanks Dcraigo (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Dcraigo,

see Commons:Categories#Creating a new category. If you tell, which one you want to (re-)create, I can do it for you. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I don't know if I will be able to create it all by myself. Can you help me to create it instead? The category is for Mina Luna Dcraigo (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Just like Guilldermo del toro category Dcraigo (talk) 11:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

I think Category:Mina Luna Vincent would the appropriate name. However, as it had formerly been deleted for being empty, is the any Commons-compliant content? --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Okay no problem

But what is Commons-compliant content Dcraigo (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Content that is validly under a free license, compliant to our license-policy. Problem with restoration of this cat is that currently there seem to be no Mina-Luna-related images on Commons. So, if I undelete or recreate said category, it will be deleted again soon as being empty. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, do you copyright for the category and images of her? Dcraigo (talk) 12:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I do not really understand your question "do you copyright ?". What do you mean by that? --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

i mean is it copyright for the category Dcraigo (talk) 17:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

That does not make any sense. I get the impression that you do not unterstand what I wrote on April 25th and 26th. The category about which we are talking since 2 months, was deleted several times because it was empty. There were no images of said Mina Luna Vincent available. If that is still the case, then it makes no sense to recreate said category, because it will again be empty. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Ohh okay I get

there is image of Mina Luna on wikicommon now which has been used on different languages of Wikipedia and other wiki sisters. And if more image is needed, there are available that I can upload with upload wizard Dcraigo (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

What is the filename of said image? --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jazmin_Yvette_Gonzalez_Luna.jpg Dcraigo (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Well, this file has already been requested for deletion by someone else. So, as I assumed earlier, there seems to be no legitimate content for the discussed category. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

ohhhhhh Dcraigo (talk) 07:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Cabot Logo.png

Hi Túrelio. This is in reference to User talk:Túrelio/Archive17#File:Cabot Logo.png since File:Cabot Logo.png was deleted by Krd on March 28, 2023 per COM:CSD#F5 but then reuploaded the following day by a user named Rockswanson. It still has the same issues as before, and my guess is that the uploader is either Cabotcoop or someone else associated with Cabot Creamery. I don't think this file can be keep without VRT verification or something else showing it has been released under as licensed; at the same time, it's going to start being disrupted if a new account is created to reupload the file each time it's deleted. Any suggestions on what to do here? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Lotta Svärd badge.svg

How do you do? Could you please explain why this file got deleted? Sincerely, Kwasura (talk) 12:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Kwasure, it had been tagged for deletion by somebody else as "Derivative work of the badge designed by sv: Eric Vasström in 1922 who died in 1958." I had tagged it as "deletion error", as it could technically not be deleted (unknown reason) for some time. But, finally it was deleted by a colleague of mine. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Modern swami

cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Swami Vivekananda 1893 Speech Why We Disagree.ogg and File:Text-Video-World-Parliament-of-Religion-1.ogv. This presumably also applies to File:Vivekananda1.ogg (see its talk page), File:Text-Video-Weltparlament-der-Religionen-SV.ogv, and File:Text-Audio-SV-World-Parliament-of-Religion-disagree.ogv. CC Infrogmation who closed the DR. The videos give Youtube as their source, and the description on Youtube give Wikisource as their source (where the videos were in use until today when I removed them, as they are not compliant with the annotations policy in addition to be being likely copyvios). So almost certainly they are modern user creations by the same person that added them to enWS. The audio file seems to have been confirmed as a modern fake since there are no known recordings of the speech in question. Xover (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Map of Terek oblast (Russian empire) 1862.png

File:Terek oblast 1862.png. This card of the same series. On the external site since 2012 and in the Commons since 2019. You are sought to look in the version of the deleted file where there is a link. 195.19.124.2 01:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Regarding the "Most handsome boy in the world"

You may need to just Special:Nuke Falakhussain786's uploads. They're all just personal snapshots amd selfies, mostly with filenames of some permutation of "Most handsome boy in the world". Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

local maps by year category

Good day, thanks for your work. I notice you deleted Category:1855 maps of New Orleans with the comment "incorrectly named) duplicate, content moved to Category:1850s maps of New Orleans" - not strictly true, as it is an intersection of 1855 maps, 1855 in New Orleans, and 1850s maps of New Orleans. That being so, I'm wondering about the reason for deletion. Why was this category not appropriate to exist? Wondering, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Infrogmation,

I found the cat empty and speedy-tagged[5]. The cited comment is the default of the C2-speedy script. Please, feel absolutely free to undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I'll have to check, sounds like someone else emptied it out first. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Bild Wegekreuz in Hergenrath

Hallo Túrelio

heute habe ich bei einer Radtour ein Wegekreuz hinter der Kirche in Hergenrath aufgenommen, aber beim Hochladen ist mir ein Missgeschick passiert, wobei ich nicht weiß welches. Das Bild wird auf jeden Fall nicht angezeigt, obwohl es ordnungsgemäß wie immer hochgeladen wurde. Ich vesuchte es mal mit einer neuen Version, doch irgendwie klappt das nicht. Was ist zu tun???

Vielen Dank im Voraus, ArthurMcGill (talk) 16:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hat sich erledigt, jetzt ist es da (wie von Geisterhand), Gruß --ArthurMcGill (talk) 16:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Prima. Ich hatte am Nachmittag im Garten gearbeitet. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Open access journals confirmation

Hey Túrelio. I'm confident that I understood it right that these journal articles are indeed at the tagged license:

• File:A Bayesian phylogenetic study of the Dravidian language family.pdf - CC-BY-4.0
• File:Movies that Actually Get History - The Case and a Half of Kashmir Files - A Study in Social Blogging.pdf CC-BY-2.0

Could you be kind and confirm the same? There're a ton of these articles which would be benefited uploading here [unless they're already on Internet Archive?] Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi DaxServer,

 Done. The 2nd one has conflicting statements wrt the license-version; website says 4.0, pdf says 2.0. But doesn't matter much. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much:) DaxServerOnMobile (talk) 07:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey. I'm wondering if I could semi-automate the uploads. It seems most of it can be. I'm wondering if it is regarded as bot editing. If so, I'd have to get the Bot approved? -- DaxServer (talk) 18:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Silvio-Scaglia.jpg

Hi Turelio, about the image of Silvio Scaglia you have deleted (File:Silvio-Scaglia.jpg) dec 2022, Mr Scaglia have send at that time an email, as request, with the autorization. Let me know why the image was deleted and please let me know what to do to upload again. Ciao --Abyssadventurer (talk) 09:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Abyssadventurer,

there wasn't any hint of a permission in the file-description. Had the said permission been sent to OTRS/VRT? --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Question Copywriting

Hello Túrelio, An image I uploaded last week has been deleted for "Copywrite violation". I have the permission from Qwant to use this image in the french page of "Qwant Junior". How can I proceed to submit it with the permission attached? Thanks! Drai000 17/04/23 Drai000 (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

in the description (was it File:HP Qwant Junior.png?)) there wasn't any mention of a permission. Did they sent it to OTRS? See Commons:Email templates for the process and a template for such a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Astounding service

I have no idea how you have the patience nor the energy to delete all that requires deletion. Thank you for your hard work 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Well, someone has to do it. You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Bruckner' Works on the German Wikipedia

Dear Túrelio,

In the past I have updated the pages on the Bruckner works which were already present on the English Wikipedia and created individual pages for all the other Bruckner works with exception of the piano and organ works and the Kitzler-Studienbuch for which I have created a descriptive list. Thereafter I have translated/adapted all these pages on the French Wikipedia. I am updating these Wikipedia pages every time there is new significant information about the Bruckner works.

I just have started on 14 April 2023 to do the same for the German Wikipedia. I have already created the pages Messe für den Gründonnerstag and Missa Solemnis (Bruckner), and expanded the already existing pages Kronstorfer Messe and Windhaager Messe, but it is not an easy job because of my not optimal practice of the German language. Do not hesitate to have a look on these pages and to improve their content.

Have a fine day! Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 12:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, Réginald. I'll look into it. --Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Neilson

All locomotives in this category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Neilson_Reid_locomotives need changing to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Neilson_locomotives 89.240.14.140 10:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi 89.240.14.140,

that's an issue of :en-Wikipedia, not Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Missing permission of copyvio

When it comes to album covers and film posters with no evidence of permission is it better to mark them as copyvio or to mark them as missing permission? Trade (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, well, both would be ok. A possibly more specific strategy might be to tag those, which are simply claimed "own work", as copyvio, and those, which are (more or less properly) sourced, though without compliant license, as no-perm. That might have an educatice effect on uploaders. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Amb. Konstanty Radziwiłł.jpg

Hi, why did you delete this file? It was published under Creative Commons 3.0 PL, not Cc-by-nc-nd-3.0? Niegodzisie (talk) 21:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't check before deletion. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Charles Stanley 2020 (QS2dw7EzUk0).jpg

This file I uploaded (File:Charles Stanley 2020 (QS2dw7EzUk0).jpg) was deleted due being tagged as a copyright violation. However, the video this file came from came straight from the official channel (In Touch Ministries) and was uploaded initially with a CC-BY mark, as evidenced by this Archive link of the video when you click the Show more tab: https://web.archive.org/web/20200810013925/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS2dw7EzUk0

With this, and because CC licenses cannot be revoked, may this file be undeleted please?

Thanks for your time. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

You are correct. However, as the deletion was performed by my colleague Polarlys, I would recommend to ask him directly. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Alrighty, thanks for telling me. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 10:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Dear Turelio

I'm using your image of a knight in my book for grade 3s AcerBS (talk) 20:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying, though I have no idea to which of my images you are refering. --Túrelio (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Jeronimo Rodrigues

Dear Túrelio. About File:FOTO-OFICIAL-JERONIMO-RODRIGUESjpg.jpg, could you please send me the link to the page from where the copyrighted image was extracted? A.WagnerC (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Sure: https://www.bahia.ba.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/FOTO-OFICIAL-JERONIMO-RODRIGUES.jpeg . --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! A.WagnerC (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Does this image of Jerônimo Rodrigues meet the Commons requirements? I ended up uploading one of restricted content in the Wikis projects, but if this one works, I will replace them. A.WagnerC (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sure. It is under a free license of a credible Flickr-account. --Túrelio (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:How to pronounce k6ka.ogg

Hi Turelio, I just noticed that this sound file was deleted for "username pronouncation of banned user created in violation of ban". I'm a bit confused by this, since I was the one who recorded the sound file, and as far as I'm aware, I'm not banned from Commons or any other Wikimedia project. I did notice some IP users (88.237.3.193 and 88.252.99.51) that have been tagging my files for deletion, and also causing trouble on IRC. Per this edit, it's evidently an enwiki LTA. Could the sound file be undeleted, since this is clearly a mistake? Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sorry that I didn't notice that. File restored and IP-protected. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Review

Hi. If you are available, could you confirm that File:Alyssa Sutterland 2023 02.jpg's license is valid? Have a nice day. Nyxaros (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Duplicate redirects and deletions process question

Here- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Secretary_Blinken_Meets_with_Mayors.jpg&action=history you created a redirect to the duplicate file and deleted my upload.

My three uploads from the U.S. Department of State had the same source, same file size, same date and exact time, but were deleted. I understand that the second User to upload the "duplicate" file, as determined by the date/time stamp, gets deleted. How did you determine that all three of my uploads were to be deleted? I also noticed that 2 of my 3 deleted uploads were listed on the duplicate template page as "1." and the two kept files were "2." What criteria determines which file will be listed as #1 and #2? In addition, my files were more thoroughly categorized than the current files. Why did you not merge my valid categories unto the kept files?

I appreciate your ongoing effort on duplicate file clean up and thank you for helping me better understand this process. -- Ooligan (talk) 22:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio. ,Please, respond to my questions above. Thank you -- Ooligan (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Oops, sorry for the delay. A while ago I was ill for a week and then obviously forgot your request.

I rarely tag files for duplicate-deletion by myself. Sometimes, I correct the syntax of a duplicate-deletion-request by somebody else, which makes it look like I requested the duplicate-deletion. In the vast majority of cases I perform duplicate-deletions requested by other users. In case the files are in different image-format, for example TIFF and JPEG, I either reject the deletion-request or convert it to a regular deletion-discussion. In rare cases, when I think the tagged image should remain and the other should be deleted, I may reverse the deletion-"direction". If files are totally identical, usually the older upload shall remain. Usually, I visually compare the description and categories between the to-be-deleted and the to-remain image, though every now and then it may happen that I overlook something. As duplicate-deletion is something completely different then copyvio-deletion, I have no problem to revise/revert my action. So, if you want one of your files/images undeleted, just tell me. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

1st uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265407

2nd uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265408

I believe that these my two uploaded files above were listed in the duplicate tag as "1." (to-remain) and should have been "kept." Please, "revise/revert" my two uploaded files above.

This file below with same date and time, my uploaded file was listed in the duplicate tag as "2." (to-be-deleted). So, no action needed.

3rd uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265409

Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

I've undeleted the 2 above mentioned files, though they had the identical upload-date/time as their duplicates (now processed). However, yours were a bit more thoroughly categorized. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletions of fictitious flags

Hi Túrelio

Is there a way to resquest a speedy deletion of all these flags : Flags of Provinces of Algeria recreated yesterday whereas they had been removed in 2022 ([6])

All these flags are fictitious and fanciful.

The contributor Russian Onest has also uploaded other such fictitious flags ([7]) --Poudou99 (talk) 00:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Mel B Image

Hello, you recently undid my speedy delete request at File:Mel B New York 2017.jpg. However, the linked file that I listed as a copyvio is the original version of the uploaded file. In order to avoid copyright detection, the uploader changed her hair, clothing, and flipped the photo at an attempt to avoid copyright detection. Flipping the images show that they are clearly from the same source. The same thing also happened with File: Geri Halliwell attends New Year's Eve Party.jpg, however, the image I linked is not an exact match like the former, and I have not been able to find a perfectly exact match as of yet. The linked photo is the closest I've been able to find. Given that the photo has been clearly doctored in a way that has been done to the former, its copyright status is at least highly questionable. Breaktheicees (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, ok. I've put it into regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Is that necessary? That one is clearly a dupe. Compare the images when flipped, please; see: [8] Breaktheicees (talk) 16:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Maalimalar.jpg

Could you look at this file and give me a proper citation for the paper it's a scan of? The file is cited (with no other bibliographic information) at w:Vizhithelu, and I'd prefer to improve that rather than just deleting the citation or tagging it with {{Dead link}}. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, no, I can't, as I didn't tag it. However, per its appearance it's clearly a scan (a finger of the scanning person is even included) of a newspaper, though the newspaper-header was cut. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Microsoft Edge logo (2019).svg

This media file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. 89.40.24.1 01:44, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I don't think so. It had already been discussed twice, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Microsoft Edge logo (2019).svg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

File:QUEEN CAMILA (2023).png

Thank you for closing the deletion discussion of the above file, but please note that the file itself is not deleted. Thanks. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Oh, there were more than the one 1 had already deleted. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

I found a photo from the same source as the deleted photo.

Possibly this photo also lacks proper authorization (?

File:CharlesIII.png 2401:E180:8883:9AFC:56A2:FF1:2493:1592 14:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Rome-1945033.jpg

FYI, I restored the above file a moment after you deleted it (I was already working on this user's uploads) because Pixabay was actually CC0 before 9 January 2019, so this file was OK (it just needed proper COM:EI, which I added). See {{Pixabay}} for more information. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Great, thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Same thing for File:Pexels-skitterphoto-615344.jpg and File:LeiFerAlcivarez--Sao Paulo de día.jpg :). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2022/06: Memorial Hall

Hallo Túrelio, schon öfter hast Du als Admin einen Wunsch von mir als einfachem User ausgeführt, wofür ich Dir endlich mal danken möchte! Und bei dieser Gelegenheit gleich eine Frage: ich habe versucht, die im Betreff genannte Diskussion zu schließen und war der Meinung, dass jetzt ein Bot das Thema ins Archiv verschiebt, was aber bisher nicht der Fall ist. Habe ich etwas falsch gemacht? Dass ich als Eröffner der Diskussion diese schließe, ist sicher suboptimal, aber ewig offen bleiben sollte sie auch nicht. Tatsächlich wurmt es mich etwas, dass ich nicht gleich auf die Lösung mit der Kategorien-Weiterleitung gekommen bin. Telford (talk) 09:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Telford, ich denke dass das eine vernünftige Lösung ist, sowohl hinsichtlich des redir als auch der (üblichen) Plural-Kategorie. Da Commons irgendwie eine "lebendes" System ist, das sich über die Zeit entwickelt und nicht von vornherein bis ins letzte durchgeplant war, passiert es immer wieder, dass eine ursprünglich angelegte Kategorie/Gallerie/usw. sich irgendwann als unpassend erweist und ersetzt werden muss. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, danke für Deine Zweite Meinung! Eine Frage ist aber noch offen: warum bleibt die Diskussion auf Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2022/06 und wird nicht automatisch ins Archiv verschoben? Ich hatte angenommen, das dies nach ein paar Tagen von einem Bot erledigt wird, auch wenn ich dazu keinen Hinweis finden konnte. --Telford (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio, darf ich Dich noch mal an diese Frage erinnern? Ich vermute stark, dass Du als Admin weißt, wie man das richtig macht, und meine Frage nur untergegangen ist. Vermutlich steht die Antwort auf irgendeiner Hilfe-Seite, aber ich finde Commons in dieser Hinsicht etwas unübersichtlich, weshalb ich mir erlaubt habe, Dich persönlich anzusprechen. --Telford (talk) 07:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, nein, da kann ich dir leider nicht helfen. Auf Commons habe ich mich nie mit automatischer Archivierung beschäftigt, weshalb ich dazu keine Kenntnisse habe. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Suppression d'une photo non artistique prise sur la voie publique en Italie (reportage / tournage de film)

Bonjour, Comme j'ai pu en débattre longtemps avec plusieurs administrateurs de Commons (notamment le regretté Patrick Rogel et plus récemment Racconish), la suppression du fichier suivant est non conforme, selon le PD-Italy. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DeFunes-Dynam-1965-Italie.jpg

Dès lors qu'une photo non artistique (reportage ou photo de promotion, notamment) est prise sur le sol italien avant 1976, que ce soit pour le tournage d'un film italien, français ou d'une autre origine, la conséquence reste valable. L'origine du photographe n'entre pas non plus en compte. La seule exception concerne les photographies dont le caractère est manifestement artistique. Le débat a été tranché depuis bien longtemps et le cas de certaines photos comme celle-ci, par exemple, est comparable : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_de_Funès-L'Homme_orchestre_(1970)_(recadré).jpg Cordialement. Tisourcier (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

(sorry for my poor english) :

Hello, As I have been debating for a long time with several administrators of Commons (in particular the late Patrick Rogel and more recently Racconish), the deletion of the following file is not in conformity, according to PD-Italy. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DeFunes-Dynam-1965-Italy.jpg

As soon as a non-artistic photo (reportage or promotional photo, in particular) is taken on Italian soil before 1976, whether for the shooting of an Italian, French or other film, the consequence remains valid . The origin of the photographer is not taken into account either. The only exception concerns photographs whose character is manifestly artistic. The debate was settled a long time ago and the case of certain photos like this one, for example, is comparable.

Best regards. Tisourcier (talk) 15:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, the second linked file/image is dead. Anyway, I can undelete and put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk)

Same problem with the same IP

The same IP is attempting to ask for a speed deletion of this item : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trint-couple.jpg

Could-you prevent this before Racconish answer these problems ? Thank's. Tisourcier (talk) 17:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

My colleague Yann has already keep-closed the related DR. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Template:PD-IsraelGov/layout

Rename:

• Coat of arms of Israel.svg → Emblem of Israel.svg

Rkt2312 (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

No idea what you are telling me. It was renamed already in 2011. --Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

The Lockdown Sessions Cover

I never claimed to be the copyright owner on my upload of the album cover, the source I linked (https://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/sonybmg/images/roger-waters-the-lockdown-sessions-cover-2660638) is from the official Sony Music Entertainment Sweden website which has the cover licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Miklogfeather (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Sure, that was the rationale by the tagger. Anyway, I've undeleted the file and put it into a regular DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roger Waters - The Lockdown Sessions - Cover.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Faustão 2015.png

Greetings. Thanks for the warning about this image. I edit from the phone and the Vimeo license does not appear for me. I have to use the "computer version" on the phone, there it shows. Pgnm (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Yeah. It's really not nice that they hide the license on a second page. --Túrelio (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Wrong files deleted

• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230503AS-1419.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903144274/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504AS-0693.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902411112/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230503AS-1689.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903144279/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504AS-0840.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902983916/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504AS-0925.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902983911/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504CS-0149.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903144129/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504CS-0313.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902983901/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-0190.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903123819/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508CS-0071.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903349960/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-0615-2.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902963786/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-0728.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902963791/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-1210.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902390762/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-1126.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903349905/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508CS-0690.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902963771/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-0537.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903699890/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-0867.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903699870/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-0929.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903472679/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-1737.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903761773/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-0950.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903761778/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr

These twenty (19) files were tagged as exact "duplicates" and were deleted. My uploaded Flickr files were deleted, yet they were all uploaded about four (4) hours before the ones that were kept. They had been tagged with a Duplicate tag, but my uploaded files should not have been deleted.

Please, revert or undelete these twenty (19) files at your earliest convenience. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 03:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Avis demandé

Cher Túrelio, auriez-vous la gentillesse de vous pencher pour un avis sur cette page de discussion : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Françoise Huguier par Claude Truong-Ngoc Août 2022.jpg .

Avec mes remerciements, Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Mynewsdesk

Could you please verify the license of File:Daft Punk - Random Access Memories.jpg and File:Random Access Memories 10th Anniversary Edition.jpg? The fact that the two images comes from Mynewsdesk should be cause for serious scrutiny Trade (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Also File:Daft Punk in 2013.jpg--Trade (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

The first 2 image were already licensed-review by my colleague Yann. I did it now for the third one. As the subdomaine, where these images are offered, has "sonybmg" in its name and as contacts to Sony company are presented on that page, I think we can assume it to be legitimate. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Deletion log 10:32 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:Thomas Mundy Peterson by William R. Tobias - Original.tif ‎(Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:Thomas Mundy Peterson (1824-1904) NMAAHC-2015 190 003.tif)

I get the point, but given the one I uploaded was y'know, actually documented - size, printing technique, text written on the back of the image, and the one remaining lists the author as anonymous when he's listed on the source page, I do wish documentation was considered a bit more in deletions. Especially given I'm mid restoration on it so this also ruins a set of files. I know you do a million of these, and in most cases going with the oldest is the right choice, but in this case... Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok. I've reverted the process-direction. --Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. As I said, I get it: in most cases, what you did is exactly what should be done. I wish I had caught things during upload, but uploading filesizes above the 100MB limit hides some things if you don't do it the one way that flags things up. (If you don't know, you can either upload from a whitelisted libbrary or archive, or use a script to do a chunked upload. I wasn't sure if the site was whitelisted so chose the script)

I thought I did check the category, but either missed it or categorisation was another issue with that version of the file. Thanks! Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Stanhopea tolimensis.png

Guten Tag Túrelio, könntest Du bitte das oben genannte Bild auf copyright überprüfen. Dank und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Fast alle seine Uploads sind URVs bzw. unter unzulässiger Lizenz. --Túrelio (talk) 06:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

…vielen Dank und Gruß. Orchi (talk) 06:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Derivative work-related deletion requests/pending

Could you please take a look at the requests in the category? Some of them have been without any response for more than a month Trade (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Sengol Photo Andhra Patrika Telugu.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you be able to clarify if the published newspaper - 17 August 1947 - is a candidate for {{PD-1996}}? The publication was en:Andhra Patrika and sieged publishing in 1991. Thanks for your help! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Uh, I've no special knowledge about Indian copyright. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India {{PD-India}} or {{PD-India-photo-1958}} might be appropriate, depending on what you want to focus on. Assuming that it wasn't published within 30 days also in the US, then {{PD-1996}} might be ok. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Charles I execution, and execution of regicides.jpg

Hey, I agree with you that the image on the printed artifact is old enough to be in the public domain which predates any digital version. The problem is the digital scan has its own copyright which British Museum owns. BM is in the business of commercially licensing their images. BM limits physical access to the only extant PD version which allows capture the market for the digital images. In theory BM could replace the current file with a new scan before copyright expires which would extend their copyright control indefinitely, of this image, and other unique PD images, as well as images of stuff stolen from other countries in their collection. Commons licensing policy forbids use of digital images marked NC to avoid litigation. That's just the sad facts. So not wanting to start a revert war, I encourage you to revert your own revert. 104.246.130.239 10:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. I've converted your speedy into a regular DR, in order to allow for discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charles I execution, and execution of regicides.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. What is needed to combat copyfraud by institutions is not miniscule monetary penalties, but legal injunctions and undertakings imposed on them regarding public domain works in their catalogs, and arbitration for individual items in dispute with the loser to pay arbitration costs. 104.246.130.239 01:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker): This is a rather interesting article called "The Public Domain vs. the Museum: The Limits of Copyright and Reproductions of Two-dimensional Works of Art", about this topic of claiming copyright on digital images of what is in the public domain. Section 2.7, the conclusion, specifically mentions UK and EU law. Enjoy. Ww2censor (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, really helpful. --Túrelio (talk) 18:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

File:China Kawamoto Shizuoka city 202208.pngについて

こんにちは、あなたが削除したファイルについて質問です。あなたは、File:China Kawamoto Shizuoka city 202208.pngを削除しました。このファイルは、河本千奈の顔写真です。あなたは、このファイルに意味があるのに、削除しました。このような行為を繰り返すと、最悪投稿ブロックの対象になるのでご注意ください。あなたのウィキコモンズライフが充実したものでありますように。 クラフトサイダー (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, this was not deleted for reasons of scope, but because it was a copyright-violation. It was taken from https://www.at-s.com/sp/news/article/shizuoka/1203376.html?lbl=10398, which states (at the bottom) "Copyright The Shizuoka Shimbun and Shizuoka Broadcasting System., All rights reserved.". --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Rent-a-Car-Professional-Web-Banner-Design-scaled.jpg

Thanks for deleting this obvious advertisement poster. Please review all uploads by that user (and consider a warning). They all have the same problem. Thanks. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Pastor Chuck Smith (142342758).jpg

The file I uploaded of Chuck Smith has been tagged as needing OTRS permission. However, as the Vimeo upload shows under the More tab, it is under the CC-BY 3.0 license. Also, this is an official video that was put together and published by its original uploader, Calvary Curriculum. Because of this, may the missing permission tag be removed please? Many thanks. JamesTheLaptop (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! JamesTheLaptop (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Font Awesome 5 brands xbox.svg

Hey, I saw you deleted File:Font Awesome 5 brands xbox.svg and replaced it with a redirect. I think this file should be undeleted, as it has some whitespace around it and is not identical. All of Font Awesome's icons have appropriate whitespace around them to allow them to all have the same visual weight when displayed at the same resolution, making it easy to use them interchangeably in templates. If the redirected Xbox logo is used in a template designed around Font Awesome icons, it will appear too large. Could you undelete it? Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 04:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. Sorry, I wasn't aware of the difference. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

λήμμα Βαρόσι

λήμμα Βαρόσι, φωτογαρφία πανοραμική Θέα. δεν με αφήνει να ανεβάσω δική μου φωτογραφία που μοιάζει με αυτή που διαγράψατε. τι να κάνω; VasiliadouMps (talk) 16:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I have no idea to which file/image you are refering. Per our policy COM:L, only images can be uploaded, which have been released by its legitimate author under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Would this be PD-textlogo?

Hi @Túrelio, I'm wondering if you could determine if this logo could be Template:PD-textlogo. Danke! -- DaxServer (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, difficult question. It seems to belong to an US-based company, so Commons:Threshold of originality#United States would apply. Personally, I think it's too creative for PD-textlogo, because the logo uses 3 different elements: text, cup-icon and Korean (?) letter/sign (?). Nevertheless, you might upload it and let it be publicly discussed in a DR. --Túrelio (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:NIR Class 104

Please restore this category. I have no idea why you would delete it, and your edit No longer needed as we have a category for them. summary makes no sense (We did have a category for them. You just deleted it). Andy Dingley (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Restored. However, when I had deleted it, it was empty. The edit-summary has automatically been taken from the deletion-rationale of the tagger. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Thankyou.

Our policy for this is at Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Category

If a category is empty and is obviously unusable, unlikely to be ever meaningfully used, How would those apply?

Don't apply if [...] the deletion can be controversial, the category was recently unconsensually emptied, etc. This category was filled, but had just had all of its content removed by a drive-by IP, who then tagged it for deletion.

This keeps happening. There's nothing useful about "speedy deletion" as a means of doing things too fast and badly, when they don't need to be done at all. It just makes more work to unroll it all afterwards. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

And now Category:NIR Class 111 Why are you so keen to support edit-warring drive-by IPs and socks of multi-banned editors like HelpfulHens ? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

This is an unjustified accusation. The same IP, which tagged the cat for deletion, had made an apparently meaningful edit previously. Anyway, cat restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Request removal of my photo

I am kindly requesting removal of the photo of me. It's not linked any Wikipedia page and Wikimedia using it without my consent. I have tried several times without success.

I wonder why you want to keep this photo on your server. Any reasonable answer?

I really followed all the steps for deletion request maybe you have other suggestions that I should try? Thanks...

Url of the image

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Remzi_G%C3%B6kda%C4%9F.jpg

Url of the image 176.55.31.223 14:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

You seem to have misunderstood my edit. As this image already has been subject of 2 deletion-requests, which were keep-closed, a speedy-deletion is not appropriate. So, I converted your speedy-request into a regular deletion-request, which allows discussion and input of others. I did not take any position to keep or delete the image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Simon Ekpa

Can you do this one too? [9] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Discussion about it at User_talk:Let'sUploadNow#The_image_which_I_uploaded_is_free_of_copyright. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Update:[10] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Some more update (on WP):[11] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Feel free to tell me to stop bugging you, but:File:Simon Ekpa, 2023. (Official portrait).jpg. IMO these flickr claims are very likely bullshit, the pic has been online since 2017:[12] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Interestingly they went via flickr this time, possibly because someone gave them the idea: User_talk:Let'sUploadNow#The_image_which_I_uploaded_is_free_of_copyright. Oh well. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Also, I don't now the Commons-procedure when the uploader removes a copyvio-tag:[13] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Removal of File:ESWD tornado reports from the year of 2022 as of June 16, 2023.png

If File:ESWD tornado reports from the year of 2022 as of June 16, 2023.png was a copyright violation, then I think File:Tornadoes june 12 2022 europe.png is one as well. Zupaz (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Tagged accordingly. Thanks for notification. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Clarification on German laws

Hey! I have a ton of photos from CSD Parade 2022. However, I'm not sure if there're any relevant laws that'd prohibit to release such photos under CC BY. Apart from adding a Template:Personality rights, I don't see any hindrances. I know a lot of people, including myself, shield themselves [using hands] if they spot someone taking pictures in public spaces. Do you know if there're some laws that I need to refer to? Thanks for your response! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

1 page to delete

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:GCR_Class_11F 81.101.7.190 18:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done already by my colleague Gbawden. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

logo

Hi, Kindly provide me following two logo (via email on aftabuzzamanullah at gmail.com): File:Kcc-01.svg & File:Dhakacitycollege-01.svg. A user uploaded those two here but it should be on wikipedia under non-free criteria. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 03:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

file deletion question

hi Túrelio! thanks for flagging a potential copyright violation for "File:Picture of Pakistani singer and music producer Shuja Haider.jpg" Is the issue that this picture is on the artist's own Facebook page? Please help me understand how this violates copyright if it was uploaded as "own work"? I am obviously missing something. What would need to be done for this image to satisfy copyright requirements and be re-uploaded and used? thanks so much for your help! Priyanka2330 (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Priyanka2330,

you had uploaded this image as "own work". But it was found to be published on Facebook already in 2019, which makes your own-work-claim unlikely. As material published on facebook is not free, it is considered to be a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Túrelio, and thanks so much for your clarification so I can better understand this matter. The image is my own work from a few years ago and was used by the artist on his own Facebook page in 2019. Would it help if the image was deleted from FB and I reuploaded the image to Wikimedia? Or would it help if the artist (or I) was to send a permission email to 'permissions-commons'? Please advise on the best path forward so that I can also keep this in mind for future images I add to Wikimedia. Definitely not intending to violate copyright and happy to follow whatever steps you outline so the picture can added back to Wikimedia and used on Wikipedia. Thanks so much for your help. :) Priyanka2330 (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

File:AkhterHusainGovernorOfWestPakistan.png

Hi Túrelio. Can you check to see whether File:AkhterHusainGovernorOfWestPakistan.png is the same as File:Akhter Husain Governor Of WestPakistan.png? My guess is that it is and the uploader simply reuploaded the file after you deleted it the first time. This might also be a case of COM:LL given the file's EXIF data. It's possible that the uploader is manipulating EXIF data given they also uploaded File:FoundationStone-Minar-e-Pakistan.png claiming that it was digitalized in 1980, which seems a bit odd. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Löschung von Bildern

Hallo Túrelio, es gibt ein grundsätzliches Problem mit dem Benutzer A1Cafel, den ich deswegen auch auf der Administratorenseite gemeldet habe (Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:A1Cafel). Der Typ lädt hundertfach Duplikate von Flickr hoch, weil er sich nicht die Mühe macht - und ich habe ihn schon mehrfach darum gebeten, sich diese Mühe zu machen! - zu überprüfen, ob die Dateien nicht schon auf Commons sind. Jetzt haben wir einen gigantischen Salat in der Category:European Youth Event 2023, weil es 171 verschiedene Dateien zweimal gibt. Man müsste also 171 verschiedene Löschanträge stellen! Uff! Das ist mir zu viel! Daher schreibe ich dich hier an mit der Bitte, die Duplikate pauschal zu löschen, ohne gesonderten Antrag für jedes Bild. Man müsste A1Cafel bei Strafe verbieten, Flickr-Dateien hochzuladen, er ist zu blöd oder zu böswillig dafür (ich vermute Letzteres). Danke und liebe Grüße Edelseider (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Fishy building at khatib.jpg

Would like to ask if this image satisfies COM:FOP Singapore, or the painted fish is not de minimis enough? Robertsky (talk) 04:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, hard to say. De minimis unlikely. However, for now I would confirm FoP, as it might be considered part of the building. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! What defines 2d work as part of the building? the size? or that the painted shape is simple enough not to have be in consideration for copyright? Robertsky (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Much less rational, just sort of impression. It's obviously permanently "attached" to the building, not just (bill)board or alike. Depending on the local jurisprudence, it might also be below COM:Threshold of originality. --Túrelio (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting File:Regis Hotel Marriot.jpg Perhaps you can now delete its uploader who has now taken up throwing personal attacks and insults at User talk:NicolasRTucker‎? 10mmsocket (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Email

Hallo @Túrelio: , ich habe Dir soeben ein für mich wichtiges Mail privat geschickt und bräuchte Deinen Rat, vielen Dank im Voraus, Gruß, ArthurMcGill (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Fishy building at khatib.jpg

Would like to ask if this image satisfies COM:FOP Singapore, or the painted fish is not de minimis enough? Robertsky (talk) 04:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, hard to say. De minimis unlikely. However, for now I would confirm FoP, as it might be considered part of the building. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! What defines 2d work as part of the building? the size? or that the painted shape is simple enough not to have be in consideration for copyright? Robertsky (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Much less rational, just sort of impression. It's obviously permanently "attached" to the building, not just (bill)board or alike. Depending on the local jurisprudence, it might also be below COM:Threshold of originality. --Túrelio (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting File:Regis Hotel Marriot.jpg Perhaps you can now delete its uploader who has now taken up throwing personal attacks and insults at User talk:NicolasRTucker‎? 10mmsocket (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Email

Hallo @Túrelio: , ich habe Dir soeben ein für mich wichtiges Mail privat geschickt und bräuchte Deinen Rat, vielen Dank im Voraus, Gruß, ArthurMcGill (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

sembra che non tieni nulla da fare

è possibile che devi contestare anche tutto quello che si fa in un wikipedia che non sia il tuo e sono cose che nemmeno conosci? fare una traduzione per te sarebbe soltanto uno spreco di tempo Giov.c (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Alianza Senadores por la Patria & Alianza Encuentro Nacional

Hi, today I uploaded two logos of political coalitions to Commons, they were immediately deleted. The problem was that I marked the as "fair use" without know that is not permitted. I shoul've done it differentely, I know, but political party logos are still allowed on Commons, so they should be reinstated as soon as possible. Guyermou (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you are likely talking about File:Alianza Encuentro Nacional.jpg and File:Alianza senadores por la patria.jpg, right? The problem is not that you labelled them as fair-use, but that they were not released under a free license, [14] and [15]. --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Andorra is De Facto Schengen

This image needs updating. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_the_Schengen_Area.svg This link proves this. https://andorraguides.com/visa/schengen/ HelpfulHens (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Propose it on the image-talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

I spoke to an admin and they said yes! You can change it!HelpfulHens (talk) 20:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:The Centurion's Story (1910).pdf

I didn't realize initially that there was a Fæ uploaded file, and if I had I would've just used that one. But, just so you know, moving the file required a good amount of work on both Wikisource and Wikidata, so I ask that if this happens again in the future, please be mindful of the fact that it's not so straightforward to clean up on other projects. Thanks. PseudoSkull (talk) 15:17, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

As it had been dupe-tagged by the OptimusPrimeBot, the files need to have been totally identical. I wonder why at your recent upload no warning popped-up. Or did it? --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

I was semi-automatedly using Pywikibot, with ignore warnings. Do you use Pywikibot? And, if you do, do you know if there is a way that I can check to see if there's a duplicate file in Python? PseudoSkull (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, no, I don't use Pywikibot and have no knowledge about it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Lucy Letby.jpg

Why have you deleted the file Lucy Letby.jpg used in the Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countess_of_Chester_Hospital_baby_deaths ? Which picture of Lucy Letby did you delete? There are numerous, all over internet and in the British news media. The wikimedia page says that reasons are explained, but I see no explanation. Thanks. Gill110951 (talk) 05:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Wow, this deletion was nearly 9 months ago. As visible from the deletion log, File:Lucy Letby.jpg was deleted as it was "fair use"-material, which is not allowed on Commons (see Commons:Fair use). --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting File:Seal of Leland Stanford Junior University.svg due to copyright violations. Please see File:Logo of Stanford University.png for the same reason. Cheers, -- QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 21:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Same photo but edited

Hi, what do we do with photos that are obviously the same, but touched up? Files: File:Acai's Singaporean Tradition.jpg and File:Acai'sSingaporeanTradition 12.jpg Robertsky (talk) 22:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, normally they could stay both, though the retouched one should be labeled as "retouched" and in both file-descriptions the other one might be mentioned in the section "Other version". Alternatively, if the retouched version is clearly deviating from the true colors (of the object), the uploader should be asked whether he/she agrees to G7-deletion. However, due to the kind of description of this and (all ?) his/her other uploads, one could suspect these are promotional uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 05:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Bitte um Hilfe

Guten Tag, ich habe diese Datei hochgeladen: File:Molitor & Kuzmin Lichtinstallation "Container" 1997.jpg -und ich möchte den Titel ändern, geht das noch? Das Bild soll heißen "Lichtinstallation "Brauchen wir Licht?"" - nun ist die Permission schon von beiden Rechteinhabern mit dem bisherigen Titel erfolgt. Wie könnte ich das also richtig hinbekommen? Wäre für Hilfe dankbar. Naomi Hennig (talk) 13:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Naomi, m.E. sollte eine Unbenennung in diesem Fall zulässig sein, weil du die Hochladerin bist und kein Ausschlußkriterium vorliegt. Allerdings steht in der Beschreibung des Fotos auch "Container". Da das Werk ja anscheinend von 1997 stammt, frage ich mich wie denn nun der tatsächlich Name des Werkes lautet, "Container" oder "Brauchen wir Licht?" --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Ja, das hatte ich mich auch gefragt und deshalb es falsch betitelt, es heißt tatsächlich "Brauchen wir Licht?" und ich würde dann die Datei so benennen wollen: Molitor & Kuzmin Lichtinstallation: "Brauchen wir Licht?" - der Container ist nur das Medium, in dem die Installation stattfindet, ich hatte das falsch verstanden gehabt.--Naomi Hennig (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Ok. Warten wir noch die Antwort von Krd ab, da er OTRS-Volunteer ist. Du kannst die Beschreibung aber schon einmal ändern, weil das ja vom Dateinnamen unabhängig gilt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

So, erledigt. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Vielen lieben Dank, das hilft sehr :-). Schönes Wochenende! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naomi Hennig (talk • contribs)

Deleted image

Hi, I believe you may have mistakenly deleted (image, talk) an image. Please compare the deleted image to Edward's figure, here. I know they look similar, because they obviously are displaying the same thing, but they are completely different in terms of origin. If it's possible to undelete, that would be great. Thanks! Let me know if I'm missing anything. Chamaemelum (talk) 06:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Also, I may have left out attribution, (the image is "inspired" by the paper, of course); please let me know what type of attribution is required, if any, and I can fix the issue.

I will make sure to add the correct tag after it is undeleted, due to Commons:Threshold of originality § Charts. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-chart Chamaemelum (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, well, for me they look completely identical. Anyway, I will put it into a regular DR, which allows a discussion and input of others. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:EdwardsFigure.png. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Chamaemelum is uploading other copyrighted material and using incorrect licensing [16], [17] (the latter image was not published in the United States) so the claim that it is in the public domain in the United States is not true, so that should be removed. I don't have time to go through this users other uploads but many are suspect and some have been deleted. On Wikipedia this user caused mayhem and ended up getting blocked for disruption. It was later found that they added a lot of copyrighted material. I see a pattern here. It is ridiculous they are claiming above that the Edwards graph is there own but I won't be commenting about this again. It's time consuming having to clean up after a problematic user. Psychologist Guy (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Psychologist Guy, I have uploaded very old historical images and got details possibly incorrect, but those are completely different and seperate from the current image, which I made from scratch. Chamaemelum (talk) 00:59, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Deletion request made today

Hello, Túrelio! Could you help me, please? I have made a massdeletion request today, but cannot find out how to make a subpage before tagging each file. You can find them here: Files uploaded by User:Ingeborga-r https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/08/03 Best wishes Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 16:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

When I make such DRs, I create a regular (single) DR for one the affected files and then copy the resulting code from the 1st file manually onto the other affected files, and, as the 2nd step, list the "other" files on the created DR-page.

You have done it the other way round. However, you need to notify the uploader by copying the relevant script-code from zthe second line in the box in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Ingeborga-r to their usertalk-page. In addition, you need to do the same as I did to the remaining files.--Túrelio (talk) 16:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Hope it`s OK now. --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 06:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Are .pdf and .djvu files of the same book considered duplicates?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=342272372

The Internet Archive uploader https://ia-upload.wmcloud.org/ encourages both .pdf as well as .djvu files of the same title. I thought these two file formats are used on different Wikimedia Foundation projects. Is that not correct? Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 17:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Ooligan, not generally. In the mentioned case, which was nominated by third party, both files were uploaded by the same user and the djvu-file, if I remember correctly, was unused. So, it depends from the circumstances. --Túrelio (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Seven Cross Flag

08:50, 4 August 2023 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:SyroMalabar Seven Cross Flag.png (Copyright violation: Re-upload of image deleted for copyvio. See deletion log here) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)

Hi Turelio - I am new to Wikicommons ans accidentally put only one source. Actually that image is in public domain and is not copy righted or anything. Can I reupload it? Nasrani131 (talk) 14:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Nasrani131,

I will temporarily undelete this image and put it into a regular deletion-discussion, where you can provided you rationale and evidence why it might be in the public domain. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

See at Commons:Deletion requests/File:SyroMalabar Seven Cross Flag.png. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Duplicate

Hi @Túrelio Could you kindly remove this duplicate image, please? Best regards Riad Salih (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Could you temporarily undelete this "duplicate" file, please.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:03_Blinken-Marquez.jpg&oldid=694068735

@Túrelio, I would like to see the details of the duplicate file. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done, see File:03 Blinken-Marquez.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Chelsea Crest 1987-1995.png

I am confused, why was the historic crest deleted exactly? Govvy (talk) 09:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, because it was considered to be above threshold of originality, thereby copyrightable, and hardly the own work of the uploader, as they claimed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

File Undeleted

hi Túrelio.

I would like to introduce you to this file, which is currently deleted. the fact is that the information it contains is in line with the license that was entered, here I would like to ask you if you could restore this portrait?? 71.19.252.28 14:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Unknown,

as per the edit-summary, this file was not deleted for copyright problems, but because it had been uploaded by a globally (Wikimedia) blocked account. Therefore, I cannot undelete that file. --Túrelio (talk) 15:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Egelsee(Königsbronn).jpg

Hey Túrelio, why did you reverted that in my opinion better picture? Thx, Harjawalski (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, hadn't you read my comment on your talkpage? --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Yes now - just a minute too late ;-) Harjawalski (talk) 18:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

File:FwBoJtNWwAADFJC.jpg

Hi Túrelio, I wanted to message about the above image, which I see has been deleted due to a copyright violation which links to a tweet (https://twitter.com/cricketcelt/status/1657439225510342656). This is my Twitter account and I took the photo. Is there anything I need to do to get it reuploaded (uploading onto Commons isn't something I've done regularly so apologies if I've got something wrong)? Eric Idle's Cat, 20.42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Eric,

if you took the original photography, I wonder why did you upload to Commons not the camera-file with a proper filename, but instead uploaded directly the file from Twitter and adopted even Twitter's random filename. Likely you did the same with File:FotZQOUXwAADWpZ.jpg. Both files are without any camera-metadata, making them a prime-suspect for copyvio. Wrt File:FwBoJtNWwAADFJC.jpg, I can temporarily undelete the file and add a no-permission-tag. You then should send directly from your said Twitter-account a confirmation-email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), in which you should state your authorship for said image, linking both the filename here and on Twitter. An OTRS-agent will then evaluate this permission and, if o.k., add a permission-tag to the file. --Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, thank you for your swift I reply. I have done as requested and will bear in mind your advice in future: I took the photos with my phone, but then downloaded the files on my laptop when I was working on an article and remembered I'd posted them on Twitter. I will download directly from my phone in future. Eric Idle's Cat (talk) 07:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hello. Five months ago, you deleted File:Alma-Tadema - The Roses of Heliogabalus.jpg for being an exact duplicate of File:The Roses of Heliogabalus.jpg. However, that was only the case because someone else ignored the policies on overwriting FP images and overwrote the latter file without discussion and I just reverted it to the FP version. Could you please undelete File:Alma-Tadema - The Roses of Heliogabalus.jpg? StellarHalo (talk) 20:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Redirect Category:Staatse vloot

Hello Túrelio, I saw that you deleted this Category:Staatse vloot . You wrote the reason "unuseful empty category", but it redirected to the gallery Staatse Vloot. If that is the case, why is there a redirect category called Category:Armada Española? That also redirects to a gallery page. -Artanisen (talk) 04:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Artanisen, the words "unuseful ..." are not individually created, but simply result automatically from speedy-rationale C2 (=cat is empty) script. As I had overlooked your previous appeal, I will restore this cat and eventually put it into a cfd. --Túrelio (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hi, the file File:Olivia Salomon WK.jpg is from my personal photo book, i provide this photo for the note that you put as copyright violation, so, please undelete this please UserOliS (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, but you are not the uploader. The image was uploaded by User:Olivia Salomón Vivaldo. If User:UserOliS is a second account to User:Olivia Salomón Vivaldo, this should be declared on your userpage.

Now, let's assume both accounts belong to the same person. You wrote "from my personal photo book". I don't know what you meant by that. What is relevant here: who holds the copyright for this photography? Per the Berne Convention, the photographer owns/holds the copyright for the photos he/she has shot. If you have shot the image by yourself (which seems a bit unlikely to me), you would own the copyright. If you asked a photographer to shoot the image, he/she owns the copyright, but he/she may sell/give it to you. However, in the latter case, the photographer should be mentioned as author.

As the image had been prepublished elsewhere, the copyright-holder needs to send a confirmation for the choosen cc-by-sa license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Any update? UserOliS (talk) 16:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

I am not a member of the OTRS-group. So, in case the copyright-holder has sent-in a permission to OTRS, as asked for above, I wouldn't know. However, if OTRS accepts the permission, they will either restore the file themselves or ask an admin to restore it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of India.svg

Rename:

• Flag India.svg → Flag of India.svg

Rkt2312 (talk) 21:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

HEY

Why did you delete category:hey there enemy’s i am ready to probate you lol? 80.47.149.26 23:04, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Blocked. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Cover der WRB auf Wikimedia Commons

Hi Túrelio, du hast den Cover der WRB gelöscht, den ich im Dezember 2022 auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen habe. Die Veröffentlichung ist hier: https://wrb.isric.org/files/WRB_fourth_edition_2022-12-18.pdf. Auf Seite 2 steht: "This is an open access document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited." Mit dem Hochladen auf Wikimedia Commons habe ich daher kein Copyright verletzt. Aber es gibt ein Problem: Die WRB homepage, wo die WRB veröffentlicht wurde, lag bis Juni 2023 bei der Technischen Universität München. Ich habe im Dezember den damals korrekten Link angegeben: https://www3.ls.tum.de/boku/?id=1419. Im Juni wurde die WRB homepage aber zum ISRIC (Wageningen, Niederlande) verlegt. Seither führt der Link ins Leere. Tut mir leid, ich habe nicht daran gedacht, dass ich bei Wikimedia Commons den neuen Link setzen muss. Deshalb nun meine Bitte: Könntest du den Cover mit dem neuen Link wiederherstellen. Danke. Eleutheropodic (talk) 13:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Eleutheropodic, sorry. Habs wieder hergestellt und das Link eingefügt. --Túrelio (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Danke!Eleutheropodic (talk) 04:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, es gibt neue Probleme. Schau mal bitte hier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WRB,_4th_edition,_Cover.jpg. Ich habe den Cover auf den WRB-Einträgen in allen 17 Sprachen wiederhergestellt. Nun hat sich Maxinvestigator aus Russland gemeldet, der die Creative Commons Attribution License nicht anerkennt. Ich habe ihm natürlich geantwortet, aber ich weiß nicht, wie es nun weitergeht. Kannst du mir bitte helfen? Vielen Dank. Eleutheropodic (talk) 07:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Firstly, the work initially has a copyright sign. Secondly, there is no specific license for Creative Commons. Because of this contradiction, you cannot upload this file as free. Maxinvestigator (talk) 08:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

1) A (C)-sign per se has little meaning, as today nearly everything is considered to be under copyright. Even freely licensed works are usually still under the copyright of their creator, though they offer them under a free license.

2) On page 2 of the (above linked) pdf-file, of which the discussed image is the cover-page, states: "This is an open access document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."
"Creative Commons Attribution License" is the CC-BY license. So, there is no doubt about the licensing. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Fine. But I'll ask one of the authors of the photos. Maxinvestigator (talk) 08:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

They are mentioned in the same section on page 2 of the pdf. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks to everybody. Just an additional request. From the same document, I uploaded this to Wikimedia Commons: File:Soil Texture Flow Chart of the 4th edition of the WRB.png. Can you please remove the warning there as well. Thanks. Eleutheropodic (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done, though I would prefer to an information about the source of the 2 photographies on that page. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I added the authors of the photographs. Eleutheropodic (talk) 19:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

And for more information see Acknowledgements (page 11) Eleutheropodic (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Unnecessary image

Hello, I came here to ask you to delete the image "File:Entrevista_Diniz_e_Nino.png", as it is just a clone that I accidentally created. KakuLogia+ (talk) 22:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Theresunset

Hello Túrelio!

I noticed that you quickly acted on the copyvio deletions I tagged just now. Thank you very much for your vigilance.

I was just wondering if you had time to do the same for this deletion request I submitted a few days ago with images from the same user: Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/08/16#Uploads_by_User:Theresunset. All of these images were tagged as public domain or with no license at all, and all of them are taken from various internet sources. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if this person understands the concept of copyright very well. Thank you very much. Mr. Gerbear (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Hmm, it would really have been better to put the different file-groups into separate DRs, instead of putting them all into one, as some could actually be speedied due to being clear copyvios. --Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Dan - November 13 2007.jpg

Now I see it. Source is http://www.dan-wagner.com/ where the footer says © 2022 copyright Dan Wagner. All rights reserved, but the CC is in the picture. Good catch. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Verwijdering van Bestand:20-Voorplaat Bastion Hotels 1990

U heeft een afbeelding verwijderd omdat deze niet de juiste rechten had. Deze afbeelding is ontworpen en geschetst door Leonard van Veldhoven zelf, zou u deze weer terug willen plaatsen? Vriendelijk dank. J.Bolle (talk) 10:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you are refering to File:20-Voorplaat Bastion Hotels.jpg? Well, you wrote "own work" (of you), which isn't true then. Anyway, if Leonard van Veldhoven is the artist, he needs to send a confirmation of the free license, under which you uploaded this image, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). If he is willing to do this, I can temp-undelete the image. --Túrelio (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

From DR to Duplicate?

Dear Túrelio, Am I allowed to replace all deletion requests currently at this talk page (that are still open) with duplicate requests? This would make it easier for involved admins, and save time for everyone. Vysotsky (talk) 12:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

as obviously nobody commented in the DRs and as the nominator did not link the specific target-files, I see no problem with your plan. --Túrelio (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done Vysotsky (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Roberto Vannacci

FYI here some information is missing, or the deletion is wrong. I see a link to this website where there is the image used on Wikipedia with the clear information "Foto tratta da wikipedia" (that is "Photo taen from Wikipedia). It was clearly added recently (I had few doubts about that, but webarchive is quite clear). It took me 2 minutes to point out and I was lucky because I remember the image since I have added the P18 on Wiidata, and I know it's that one. Alexmar983 (talk) 03:41, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the information. I've undeleted the image and put it into a regular DR to allow for discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roberto Vannacci.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Kristina Andreyevna Potupchik (cropped).jpg

Why reverted? As an uploader I can nominate it for deletion. It is written in the rules. FlorianH76 (talk) 20:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

1) You tagged it for speedy deletion; that's not the same as (regular) deletion. 2) "The rules" allow the uploader to request deletion of an (unused) image within 7 days after upload. This one was uploaded in April and you tagged it in August. So, to request its deletion now, you need to open a regular deletion-request and provide a serious rationale (other than just "uploader request"). --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

But why uploader can't delete the own upload? FlorianH76 (talk) 10:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Think of it as gift you gave (in this case to humanity). It's a bit like retracting a gift. Legally speaking: 1) external sites might be using this image, as it was offered under a free license. If the image is deleted, there is some risk they might be sued for copyright-violation and for some it wouldn't be easy to prove otherwise. 2) CC-licenses, if validly given, are considered non-revokable. --Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Vande Bharat Express (Aug '23).jpg

Hey @Túrelio,

I request you to kindly revert that picture back since it was originally taken by my cousin Pavan Kumar who visited that factory to witness the new livery of the express train. I need to know how it's considered as copyright. I clearly mentioned that source owner was my cousin. Harshul12345 (talk) 16:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

@Harshul12345: Hi, and thanks for your contributions! I see that you have been uploading photos taken by your family members, not yourself. From a legal standpoint, this is technically a copyright violation because you don't own the copyright: your family member does. To make sure everything is legally valid, can you please have your cousin and your brother send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? The content of the email should be something like this: "My name is [name] and the Wikimedia Commons user Harshul12345 is my [relationship]. I hereby authorize them to upload all photos I take to Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 license. This declaration is valid for all uploaded items in the future." The email should include the URLs of the files you already uploaded, and the VRT team member will place the ticket number on the image page. You will then be able to use the same ticket number on any future uploads of their photos. Thanks again! —holly {chat} 17:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

@Harshul12345: the mentioned image is a collage of 2 images. The upper one is offered as single-image on Shutterstock and Adobe Stock Images. Both agencies offer it for editorial use only. Therefore, I find your claim "1st Pic - own pic" not credible. And the lower image of this collage, which you credited to your cousin, seems to be a screenshot from this unfree Youtube-video (01:34).--Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Undelete File:20-Voorplaat Bastion Hotels.jpg

Hi Turelio, could you please undelete above file, permission has been received from the designer, per Ticket:2023082010001841. I could do it myself, but that is perhaps against some guideline. Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Ellywa,

 Done. Thanks for asking; though it's not necessary, as I trust the OTRS/VRT-guys (and my admin fellows). --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks (2×). Ellywa (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

You deleted File:Mojtaba Azizian 01.jpg as a copyvio

The same file (name) is back, same uploader. I cannot see linkedIn profiles, so have started a DR. If it is a copyvio it could be deleted faster! 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification at the DR 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:34, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Turkish Album Cover File:Mavi Işıklar – Tatlı Bela.jpg

Are you saying that a old record company that was shut down years ago owns the copyrights of this image, why did you include it in fast deletions? Lim10Sevdalısı (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

@Lim10Sevdalısı, you are aware that copyright lasts, in nearly all countries of the world, for 70 years after the death of the author/creator? So, if this cover was created in 1968 (as per your description), that is just 55 years ago. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

File:JiriProchazka2022.png

Hi, you have recently deleted the following file: File:JiriProchazka2022.png whereas the YouTube video from which the picture is taken is under the Creative Commons license (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqKZtxxEaYs). So you chose to delete a file that can be used on Wikipedia...

Could you please restore the file because there was no reason to delete it and in the future, at least, just click on the links to check the Creative Commons licenses of YouTube videos?

Thanks in advance, AideDésintéressée (talk) 01:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done. The file had been wrongly tagged. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Christoph Amberger 010.jpg

Hallo Túrelio,

die Datei hatte ich zuvor in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Christoph Amberger 010.jpg explizit behalten, wie auch auf der Dateidiskussionsseite vermerkt. Dass dieselbe Benutzerin die Datei jetzt einfach als vermeintliche Dublette zur Entsorgung freigibt, ist nicht gerade "die feine englische Art". Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 10:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Rosenzweig,

upps, das hatte ich nicht gesehen. Ich kann sie einfach wieder herstellen. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

scratch deleted page

Scratch is a free platform and its creators allow sharing contents. 4.3 All user-generated content you submit to Scratch is licensed to and through Scratch under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. This allows others to view and remix your content. This license also allows the Scratch Team to display, distribute, and reproduce your content on the Scratch website, through social media channels, and elsewhere. If you do not want to license your content under this license, then do not share it on Scratch. This over here is the text that you can find here [18]. I'm a teacher and I need my pictures to teach to my pupils, pleas.. I usually take vìcare of the licence of the content I upload to commons. Thank you in advance. Matteo Mattruffoni (talk) 19:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Matteo,

I assume you are referring to the deleted file File:ScratchJrGuidaInterfaccia.png, right? Or also other files?

As I was offline most of the day and don't have enough time at this moment to thoroughly study the above linked ToU, I will conditionally restore the screenshot. But we really need to be sure that a screenshot of the Scratch GUI is really also under a CC license. --Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

"Can I use screenshots of Scratch in a book or presentation?

Yes, you can use screenshots / images of the Scratch application and website in a book or presentation, and consider them to be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. We ask that you include a note somewhere in your materials saying: "Scratch is a project of the Scratch Foundation, in collaboration with the Lifelong Kindergarten Group at the MIT Media Lab. It is available for free at https://scratch.mit.edu"." per [19]. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Why did you remove my own picture - that I OWN ???

Please do not remove pictures that I have posted as my own media. Newart61 (talk) 18:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

@Newart61 I see that you claimed that the "owner of original shot is Phil Soussan who has licensed it here." at File:Philsoussan_0525.jpg. Please have the photographer or copyright owner sent permission to COM:VRT. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

External links on talk pages

Hi Túrelio! Just out of curiosity. Can you please tell me where I can find such a recommendation that records of external uses of media in the form of external links on discussion pages are welcome. Am I missing something? As for me, talk pages should be intended for completely something else, for example, for discussion of various issues concerning the file, but certainly not to be an archive of external links. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 02:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Kirilloparma,

we have a template {{Published}} to record external uses. See File talk:MotherTeresa 090.jpg for example. Of course, there is no obligation to record such uses or to use said template. However, I am aware that a number of prolific contributors do actively use it for their own uploads. For myself, I try to record any re-use of Commons-images that I stumble over. However, due to limited spare-time, I usually record only the link to the re-use, but do not complete all data which the template asks for; as this can be done later. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

File:육지혜.jpg

Please see the small CC-BY icon at the right bottom of the posted page 119.204.148.84 10:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks for notifying. I had looked for it, before I tagged the file, but did not find it. --Túrelio (talk) 12:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Joselito

In the source LastFm, there is written: En Last.fm, cualquier usuario puede editar las descripciones de los artistas. ¡Contribuye cuando quieras! Todos los textos de contribuciones de usuarios en esta página están bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual; es posible que se apliquen condiciones adicionales. Thanks.--Salnitrum (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

It states "Todos los textos"; that is not valid for the images. --Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:Ukrhydroenergo vs Category:Ukrhidroenerho

Can you take a look into the old version of the deleted category, to repair the redirect, please? I don't see the deleted versions... Wieralee (talk) 18:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

I have temporarily undeleted the 2nd cat, as I don't know with term is the correct one. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Tater Tot bonkers.webp

Hello, it appears that you removed the above photo from Wikimedia Commons as a copyright violation, causing it to be removed from the Wikipedia article Tater Tot (cat). However, the photo in question was actually an original photo taken and owned by the human caretaker of the cat, Ash Houghton (Wikipedia username Inertiaash ), who posted it shortly before it was removed. Her posting it is shown in the history of the Tater Tot (cat) Wikipedia page, and she also mentioned on the cat's public social media group that she had added his picture to his page at the time she posted it.

It is possible that the photo used by Ash might have been licensed by her to some media outlets, as the cat had a lot of media coverage worldwide, and many of the outlets used, hopefully with Ash's permission, original photos of Tater Tot taken by Ash and posted to her/ the cat's social media before he went viral. It is also possible that perhaps Ash did not observe some "best practice" in uploading her original photo, as I am not sure how often she edits Wikipedia.

In any event, would it be possible for you to undelete the photo? If not possible, what steps can we take to put an original photo of Tater Tot taken by Ash and used with Ash's permission up on his page (or elsewhere if his article ends up getting merged as result of AFD process). Best regards, TheBlinkster (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi @TheBlinkster, it's indeed possible what you outlined in your 2nd paragraph. It would likely be sufficient, if Inertiaash either sends an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) just confirming that she is the true photographer of the 2 images in this montage or, if possible, sends the montage in JPEG format with camera-data (metadata). In the latter case it is not necessary that she releases the JPEG-version under a free license, if she doesn't want that. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, I will reach out to her and see if we can do all that. TheBlinkster (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Android 7.1.2 Nougat, Google Pixel Screenshot.png & File:Nokia 7 Plus with Android Pie.jpg

Hi, Could you check to see if the two deleted screenshots contain any wallpaper on Category:AOSP wallpapers? Thanks. Larryasou (talk) 09:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi, no, they don't. The 1st one is in shades of green and is probably a satellite-image showing an ocean-coast (under water); the 2nd one is in blue and shows likely a night-sky in the arctic with snow/ice on earth in the foreground. --Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick reply. It's all right. Larryasou (talk) 10:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

And what about these old screenshots?

• File:Android KitKat screenshot.png <- yes, but only the second (uploaded 06:53, 3. Nov. 2013) of 5 revisions
• File:Android 4.4 on the Nexus 5.jpg <- no
• File:Android 4.4.2 (Nexus 5).png <- no
• File:Android 4.4.2 Home screen.png <- yes

Do they contain the same wallpaper as File:Nexus 5 (2).jpg? Larryasou (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Replied inline. --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!

I can't find the thank button next to deletion edits, so I'll just do it like this. Thanks for swifly responding to my deletion request, it's appreciated! ReneeWrites (talk) 12:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Deletion

"File:Kesagake death.jpg", "File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1914).jpg". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.207.152.8 (talk • contribs)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Can 1972 (Heinrich Klaffs Collection 102).jpg

Could you help me check the source of the file? Thanks. Larryasou (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

It was http://www.flickr.com/photos/heiner1947/4409494480/sizes/l/in/set-72157623560321196/ . --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

actions are ripping sources out from images

You are aware that by rolling all images of a specific blazon together you are ripping out source material? All the coats of arms I uploaded to commons had such information, that is which blazon (mostly Loutsch, Armorial du Pays de Luxembourg, I hope I don't have to explain what a blazon is) I based the image on and it's blazoning in multiple languages. That is, what you are currently doing is saving some storage space on commons but reducing the quality of information. A coat of arms is not just an image but always also its blazon which in many cases is the more important data (I'm working on the Chifflet-Prinet roll of arms off Wikipedia right now, all I have to go on is a blazon, not some image I might be copying). Not to mention that the text accompanying a file is separately licensed (usually GNU) from the image, not that the later matters much with heraldry as blazoning in and of itself is not copyrightable. I can't even verify your exact actions as the files are immediately deleted (without the usual process of alerting the author) and as a non admin I have no access to the original information. I find this activity odd, I would not even have noticed at this time if my phone had not sent me strange notifications. I am not active here anymore, only do occasional text edits when I notice a problem in an article, so go ahead and continue this way. But maybe you should think your actions over, I really don't think this is productive. --Caranorn (talk) 20:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Caranorn,

sorry for this mess. I admit that I relied on the requesting user (User:Kontributor 2K) to act reasonably. Every day there are several hundreths of duplicate-requests to process, in addition to other speedy-requests. First, I can list the blazon/blason-images which I have dupe-deleted recently. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

It would have been better if this had gone through the regular deletion process including notifying the users involved. It's still not certain I would have noticed as I don't look at my talk pages often, but at least I would have had the chance to explain the issue in the deletion request. While I was active here in Commons I always tried to list as detailed source information as I could, that is where I found the information including page numbers and the description in that source. I then would translate the blazon from French into English, in some cases I had an Italian speaking user knowledgeable in heraldry help and add that language as well (oddly enough, looking over my files, I don't seem to have added the German blazon). It's not much data, but I found it to be useful at the time. Looking at the files of mine you deleted, I realize that the blazons in at least two languages were at least copied. The detail on their owner/bearer on the other hand was shortened, the source information had page numbers cut off. But as you said, it seems that loss of information comes from User:Kontributor 2K, that is when he uploaded his new images to consolidate the others he did not include all that information. This is not a personal matter for me, even if I am inactive here I still see commons and the other projects are important. If it is in the interest to delete my files to maintain quality I have no problem with it. I just think as much information as possible should be included. --Caranorn (talk) 07:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Caranorn,

I have added information about Warsberg and Limpach on the pages,

Sorry for this omission,

--Kontributor 2K (talk) 09:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

• File:Blason-Famille-de-Méjanès.svg
• File:Blason Famille d'Albignac II.svg
• File:Blason Famille fr de Loubier.svg
• File:Blason famille fr de Méjanès.svg
• File:De Méjanès.svg
• File:Blason famille fr de Méjanès 1.svg
• File:Blason-Famille-de-Méjanès1.png
• File:Armoiries de Limpach 1.svg
• File:J Molay.jpg
• File:Armoiries de Warsberg 1.svg
• File:Blason fam fr Benserade 3.svg
• File:Blason famille fr de Bonnefous de Presque.svg
• File:Blason famille de Mongey.svg
• File:Schoeftland-blason.png
• File:Famille de Pélamourgue - Or.svg
• File:Famille de Pélamourgue - Azur.svg
• File:Famille de Pélamourgue - Argent.svg
• File:Blason famille fr Bardon2.svg
• File:Blason famille fr JARENTE.svg
• File:Blason famille fr SERRE.svg
• File:Blason Sampigny.svg
• File:Blason Fr famille Ferron-Ferronays (Bayonne).svg
• File:Blason famille Lauzanne.svg
• File:Blason BenoitXIV.svg
• File:Blason Eon Guillemet.svg
• File:Blason de la famille Dupuy de Lome.svg
• File:Blason famille fr Pellan.svg
• File:Forceville (de) 1.svg
• File:Blason famille fr de Colombières.svg
• File:Blason famille fr Solinhac.svg
• File:Blason-Authieule.svg
• File:Montjésieu.svg
• File:Terrasson du Lyonnais.png
• File:Blason ville fr Mareuil (Somme).png
• File:Belvezet.svg
• File:COA fr Uzel.svg
• File:52019 - Blason - Arnancourt.png
• File:Blason Famille Laval d'Arlempdes.svg
• File:Blason de Payen et Hugues du Buat.png
• File:Spert de Volhac.svg
• File:Blason famille grassoise Robert Escragnolles.png
• File:Blason famille grassoise Villeneuve(de).png
• File:Armoirie de Meherenc de Saint Pierre.png
• File:Armoiries du Général Xavier Duhesme.svg
• File:Blason famille fr d'Ysoré d'Hervault.png
• File:Blason Famille fr Bar.svg
• File:Armoiries Famille de Chartres.svg
• File:Blason famille de Kerdreiz.svg
• File:Blason famille fr Botmiliau2.svg
• File:Coetanlem.svg
• File:Coat of arms Kergrist.png
• File:BlasonAD.png
• File:De Suat.svg
• File:Blason famille fr de (La) Romiguière.svg
• File:Blason Famille fr de-Villettes.svg
• File:Blason Duhesme.svg
• File:Armes Bès de Berc.png

Deleted from 24th to 13th of September. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:2023 stamps of Germany

Hallo, könntest du bitte erläutern, wieso die Kategorie gelöscht wurde? Dort waren bis dahin mindestens zwei lizenztechnisch saubere Bilder einsortiert, insofern verstehe ich die Begründung nicht. MfG --A.Savin 10:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi, als ich sie gelöscht hatte, war sie jedenfalls leer. Markiert war sie von Adamant1. Die edit-summary wird automatisch aus dem Text im Baustein übernommen. Ich kann sie gerne wiederherstellen. --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Ja bitte, denn sie ist nicht mehr leer. Wer ist bitte Adamant1, um sich blind auf seine Aktionen zu verlassen? War in diesem Fall alles völliger Unfug. --A.Savin 10:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

I left a message on A.Savin's talk page about it. Really, I should should have been the one to message. Regardless though, we don't usually create categories for stamps where the year of the stamps is copyrighted and a user was recently blocked for doing exactly that after multiple warnings not to. Otherwise it's just that much harder to find copyrighted stamps. Which is why up-merged the images in the category and nominated it for deletion. So I'd appreciate it if you both left them in the main category. At some point I'll move them "by decade" categories, but I just haven't got there yet. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Can you please restore my edits and re-delete the category if A.Savin isn't willing to since there was nothing "blind" about it and I made them based on prior consensus? I made the edits as part of a larger project to move images of stamps to "postage stamps" categories anyway and A.Savin undermining things by showing concern about something that isn't an issue really doesn't help. So I'd appreciate it if my edits where restored regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Wen Tong.jpg

Referring to your revert of my duplicate file nomination, I'd like to ask why a 635×997 pixels file is better than the 1,830×2,880 pixels replacement file. Moreover, if you look at the calligraphy at the top right corner, you'll see some of the calligraphy was cut out during the scan process. Your explanation is appreciated, thank you.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I am aware of the lower resolution of the now kept file. However, if you look at the image/drawing of the Bamboo-branch, you will see that the brown background in homogeneous in the lower-res image, whereas it shows really a lot of artifacts/damage in the higher-res image. That was why I want to keep both files. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Noted, thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 00:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Can you please review these

I would request you to kindly review some GODL-India images that I have uploaded or have worked on in past few days. Its presence in the given link needs to be confirmed. It will be of great help. Some of these are used widely by some of the most viewed pages on Wikipedia.

• File:Bharat Mandapam Morning View.jpg +
• File:Bharat Mandapam Evening View.jpg +
• File:Official Photograph of Prime Minister Narendra Modi Portrait.png +
• File:President Droupadi Murmu official portrait higher version.jpg +
• File:Union Minister for Home Affairs.jpg +
• File:Atal Bihari Vajpayee (crop 2).jpg +
• File:India-Middle East-Europe Economics Corridor.jpg +
• File:The Union Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, Coal and Mines, Shri Pralhad Joshi.jpg +
• File:Yogiji with President Murmu.jpg +
• File:Yogiji in 2023.jpg +
• File:The Union Home Minister, Shri Amit Shah, in New Delhi on August 19, 2019 (cropped).jpg +
• File:Shri Raj Kumar Singh calls on the Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi, at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg, New Delhi on July 07, 2021.jpg +
• File:Raj Kumar Singh with PM Modi (cropped).jpg +
• File:The Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Shri Uddhav Thackeray calling on the Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi, in New Delhi on February 21, 2020.jpg +
• File:Bharat Mandapam Pragati Maidan.jpg +

I know the list is quite long. But I don't know what else to do. Please help. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio I asked to do this to two more admins one turned down and one kindof ignored. Thatswhy I am here. It might be jumping the queue but there are so many unreviewed GODL-INDIA images. So I thought this might be a better choice. If not all are possible right now because of your workload, then do atleast some now and some later may be tomorrow or when you feel free. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Shaan Sengupta,

for now I have reviewed 3 images of the list; the others later. However, I can now fully understand the reluctance of my colleagues with reviewing files under that license. The review-script doesn't work. Clicking on the small script below the description-box ".. file version controlled .." doesn't work.

To get a proper result, you have to manually add a line of code from Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India to the image-page, then manually add the date and copy a portion from the existing line of license-code on the image-page into the new line of code and then remove the old line of code. Of course, plus checking the provided source. That's an absolute mess. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio Man this really is a mess. Anyways I thank you for this. Hope you do the rest as soon as possible. One more thing I am noticing that an IP is making unneeded changes here. He just vandalised this discussion and others. Although I have reverted him would request you to take some action what you think is right. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 14:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the IP-edits. They are now blocked. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much @Túrelio. I shall be back when I need your help. File:Atal Bihari Vajpayee (crop 2).jpg isn't reviewed. Rather the file it is derived from was reviewed by you. Is it ok? Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you once again @Túrelio. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi Túrelio! Thank you very much for your quick help. (Bad Category:Gyula Rózsavölgyi). :-))) Bizottmány (talk) 07:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo la paie facile.fr.png

Hi, Túrelio. Why did you delete that file? The deletion reasons seemed invalid, so I'm wondering if there was another reason you hadn't stated.

Thanks and all the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3ALogo+la+paie+facile.fr.png Looking at it, I don't see that it was clearly forming an educational purpose, and numerous elements of problematic editing. Suggest that chasing this one is a waste of good time.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

All I want to know is the real deletion reason. I don't have any other stake in this deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Ikan,

as it was months ago, I don't have fresh memory about this file/image. When I deleted this file, the DR was not linked on the page, otherwise I would have closed the DR. I assume I made a "composite"-decision out of: 1) image being low-res, 2) being unused and 3) the uploader herself requesting deletion with rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 07:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

OK, that's good enough for me. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User's art work uploads

Thoughts on this user's uploads Category:Files by Aleksandr Glukhov of their own work. At a bare minimum we need to get them to provide permissions, though I wonder whether it would just be better not being onsite. I could be thinking too harshly, hence seeking the opinion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi billinghurst,

while I am not really versed is judging art, I think per the 2nd entry in Commons:Volunteer Response Team#When contacting VRT is unnecessary, asking for a confirmation/permission is appropriate here (outstanding or professional quality). Surely it could be a sort of "collective" permission. However, it might be wise to first check, which of his uploads are derivatives, such as File:Александр Владимирович Глухов. Времени на раскачку нет. Царь Руси. 2021. 2D графика.jpg and File:Александр Владимирович Глухов. "вЕЛИКАЯ Российская империя" (символическая композиция). 2021. 2D графика.jpg, which require additional information, as the underlying/background-image is unlikely his own work.
In addition, a colleague versed in art might evaluate whether his uploads are in COM:SCOPE (and not just using Commons as showcase). --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Nickmovies

I’m So sorry. I was testing an edit and pressed save instead of cancel by mistake. Sorry. MexTDT (talk) 20:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

No problem. --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

WRB

I received a response from Stefaan Dondeyne, permission was indeed given. Now it's OK. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Please forward the permission-mail/link to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Done. Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Slanderous accusations by BobRizzo

What is your problem? I own the copyrights. Your edits are vandalism to a wiki page. You are harassing someone based on political extremism. BobRizzo (talk) 12:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

I tried to re-upload my art that you removed for political reasons, and for the record has been publicly published, but am being stopped because of your edits. You need to re-upload my images. BobRizzo (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

As you had been told previously on your talkpage User talk:BobRizzo, your uploads had been tagged for speedy deletion (by another user, not me) for suspicion of being copyvios, i.e. without permission by the author. I then performed the requested speedy deletion, as I found it credible. Why?

Per the description of your uploads, you claimed to be the author of all these images, when in fact they are the work of Sean Delonas, a living artist, who surely still holds the copyright for his works.

Your wrongful accusations of "removed for political reasons", "You are harassing someone", "based on political extremism" against me are ridiculous and slanderous. Until this moment I didn't even know of Sean Delonas.

If you think you own the copyright for these cartoons, you need to proof it. If you obtained from the author a release under the claimed CC license, you need to forward his confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). If you are Sean Delonas by yourself, you have a conflict of interest in writing in the article about you on :en-Wikipedia, but anyway have to send a confirmation about your identity to above linked OTRS-address. Do not re-upload these images before a permission has been sent to OTRS and has been positively evaluated by OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Why is it that you and David Gerard can make scurrilous attacks about an artist and prevent wiki readers the ability to see that artist's artwork? BobRizzo (talk) 13:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Nice conspiration theory. David Gerard did not edit any of these images. They were (legitimately) tagged by another user.

Your additional accusation against me "attacks about an artist" shows how little you understand. Here on Commons we mostly care about copyright (main reason for deletions), because we respect the copyright of the artists. --Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

You won.

1) Wiki readers will NOT see cartoons and other artwork that is attacked on this wiki page (thanks to you); 2) I am Sean Delonas, the copyright belongs solely to me. I have NO idea what "They were (legitimately) tagged by another user" even means; and 3) in regards to David Gerard's edits, he removed positive stories about me claiming "dead link," which is demonstrably a false statement.

YOU are disgrace, and lack the integrity. BobRizzo (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

One last thing, you claim I'm NOT Sean Delonas. Do you want me to email me from my personal email which has my name on it, or if you like, contact me thru my website SeanDelonas.com and I'll respond. Your statement is provably FALSE. So much for integrity. BobRizzo (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

One last thing: I can't prove it, but there is NO doubt in my mind, that you are associated with political activist David Gerard (who has been harassing both myself and my family for years). BobRizzo (talk) 15:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

As any communication with you is completely futile, I close this threat here. Any further comment by you will be removed. Feel free to request un-deletion of your uploads at Commons:Undeletion requests or to voice your complaint at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. EOD. --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

File:1217 Scalettapass.jpg

Hi, I uploaded twice the same file, but it is the other one which should be deleted. I am taking care of that now. Yann (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

That's ok. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Need to take some action

@Túrelio I am here to bring one thing to your notice. User:George Simon Ohm has once again added File:Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury official portrait.jpg that you deleted as a copyvio as File:Shri Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury.jpg after I nominated it. I nominated so many files uploaded by him under GODL-India. And all of them are deleted because they don't come under it. Irritated by it he came to my talk page. There he was explained as to why those uploads were copyvio. Both by me and @Ravensfire. We told him that as written in the Website policy you need to take permission from them via email for using it. User said that he has emailed. But today the user re-uploads the image that was deleted without getting email permission. He uploads File:License for uploading pictures.png (screenshot of the website), which once again is a copyvio. He cheerypicks what suits him and encircles the word Open Data Portal and ignores the Disclaimer written in top-left. Now both the privacy policy of this website and the website mentioned in the Disclaimer i.e. of Lower House of Indian Parliament say that Email permission is required for using its content. The user is repeatedly violating it.
Now all this means either of two things.

• The user doesn't understand copyright and licensing.
• The user is desperate to upload images knowingly ignoring the rules.

In either of the cases, The User is not made for Commons. Atleast for now. I leave the rest for you. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 16:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Both the files are now deleted by @Yann. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 16:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm wondering if an alternate approach here is to start a thread at COM:VPC about this and get some wider views on this. I get where George Simon Ohm (and the other editors that are uploading images for the members of parliment from the same India.gov site) are coming from, that it feels like these ought to be covered by the GODL. Yes, they saw something on the India.gov page about the open data project, and went with that idea. Maybe having a that discussion at VPC, pinging a few other people and putting the ideas from several AFD's and talk pages I've seen may help get a consensus view on if GODL applies and maybe get some helpful text added on COM:TAG India. Ravensfire (talk) 16:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

@Ravensfire Is it possible to get GODL tag when the website clearly states that permission via email is required for using its content. And GODL-India is the tag for Government of India work. But Parliament doesnt come under Government of India. Neither does NIC. Then how is it possible. This was told to the user he replied that he has emailed. Then also he uploaded it under the same license which got deleted once. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 16:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your assumption is that the website is correctly labeled and that they are allowed to claim copyright on those images. I think that view is correct, but I also know that I'm far from an expert on the GODL and base my view on what others have posted in a few places. I haven't found a really good discussion around if GODL applies to these images or not, just a couple with a few people commenting. So maybe here we try to guide the editor, get this really answered and update the TAG India page to note that the GODL would not apply to those images. Ravensfire (talk) 17:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

@Ravensfire That is a valid discussion. Just to tell you my view GODL-India is very much messed up. But here I have highlighted that despite explaining the user has violated the same thing again. The term Open Data Portal is a link and not license on that website which takes us to other NIC website. Before laying a claim he should have verified. And if he doesn't understand licensing and copyright then commons is not for him. That is my point.Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:08, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi turelio,why o deleted files without copyright? Meruane file does not have copyright

The meruane file does not have copyright,and you have no proof that the other thing has copyright, because it doesn't. GokuJuan (talk) 20:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi GokuJuan, you are talking about File:Ricardo Meruane.jpg, right? Well, that image was published already in 2015 on Twitter. So, what do you mean by "does not have copyright"? Content on Twitter is not under a free license (or without copyright). --Túrelio (talk) 07:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

That image does not have any copyright, it was uploaded by the mayor of Viña del Mar, because that comedian appeared at the Vila del Mar festival shortly after that photo. GokuJuan (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Where is the evidence for your claim "does not have any copyright"? --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

The photo was taken in a public place, not on a television program, she did not take the photo, she only uploaded it publicly so that people knew who the comedian was who would perform at the Viña del Mar festival https:// es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Reginato she uploaded it and was mayor for many years and never said that the image had copyright GokuJuan (talk) 17:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Ok. Copyright doesn't work that way. These days/years any creative work is automatically copyrighted. Exceptions are works created by animals or AI-created works, and works created by the federal government of the U.S.. So, been taken in a public place is not relevant for copyright. Published in the web is also not relevant for copyright. Copyright usually lasts for 70 years after the death of the creator of the work; in some countries it's 50 years. It is not necessary to expressedly claim copyright or to put a (C) sign on it, copyright still exists.

So, on Commons we require for every upload, which is not understandably own work of the uploader, to provide verifiable evidence that its creator has released it under a Commons-compliant free license (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-Zero, PD, etc.). Some creators release their works under a free license on Flickr or similar platforms. In other cases a creator might grant a free license upon direct request, which then needs to be evaluated by our Permissions team. --Túrelio (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Nochmals: WRB Cover

Hi Túrelio, es gibt schon wieder ein Problem: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WRB,_4th_edition,_Cover.jpg. Der Benztzer Moheen hat eine Warnung eingefügt. Ich habe ihm vor drei Tagen geantwortet: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Moheen. Bis jetzt habe ich keine Reaktion erhalten. Könntest du dich bitte der Sache annehmen. Vielen Dank. Eleutheropodic (talk) 15:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Eleutheropodic,

das ist nicht wirklich eine Warnung, sondern eher eine Statusmeldung. Moheen gehört zur OTRS/VRT-Benutzergruppe, die sich um Permissions kümmern. Das braucht dir also keine Sorgen zu machen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, okay, danke, aber was bedeutet dann der Satz "If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT agent, this file will be deleted." ? Eleutheropodic (talk) 11:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:ईटीवी.png

Hi, Túrelio. I'm sorry, but I have to post here again, because you deleted this file without responding to my two pings by giving a reason, and the deletion request was closed by a colleague of yours with "Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio," which is obviously not a deletion reason. I suppose you believe the file is over COM:TOO India, but why couldn't you state that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Ikan,

no need to be sorry. I don't remember exactly, whether I had seen this file when it was still delete-tagged. It's more likely that I had seen it only after the nominator had escalated to speedy for copyvio (as contained logo is under fair-use on :en[20]) and had then acted on that speedy. Otherwise, I would have closed or at least commented in the DR.

So, if you want to "fight" for your argument "below TOO per Commons:Threshold of originality#India", I can undelete the file and re-open the DR. --Túrelio (talk) 14:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

It seems worth consideration whether it is or is not over COM:TOO India. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

So yes, please undelete the file and reopen the DR for full consideration, and thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Madiha Imam.png

Hi Pal! Hope you are doing well! Can you please verify license for this image?Wallu2 (talk) 18:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Amina_Okueva.jpg

Hi Túrelio, the image is a cropped version of File:Амина_Окуева_и_Джамала.jpg that you deleted with "Screenshot of non-free content (F3) and Facebook-code". If I'm interpreting it correctly it was a capture found on Facebook, am I right?. I'm asking because the text generated by {{Extracted from}} indicates that the cropped version is fine, but I don't think it is the case. Thanks. Günther Frager (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy revert

̴̴̃@Túrelio you reverted this edit [21]. Can I know where can I find the details about the licensing as I can't seem to find it. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 13:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I should really get a compensation from the Vimeo-company. They hide the license-information so well, that with every 2nd Vimeo-upload this question occurs. ;-)

Go to [22] and lock in the area of the title for the word "More" or "Mehr", depending on your language-configuration, and click on it. Then a new box opens, where the license is displayed.--Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Flag of Torres Strait Islanders

Thank you for SD-ing File:Torres Strait Islanders Flag.png. Shortly after it was deleted, I was editing in no-wiki and was surprised to see the same flag presented there in the form of this file. Will the same copyvio rules apply to that kind of 'badge design'? Then I started digging deeper and came across two more candidates for speedy deletion: File:トレス海峡諸島民の旗.png and File:Straattorres.png.

I thought it would be more efficient to go directly to you with this, since you are familiar with the copyright status of that particular flag. I hope that is OK. TU-nor (talk) 10:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

I've put the 1st one into a new DR; the 3rd one dupe-processed and the 2nd one speedy-tagged. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Buteo buteo in flight in the United Kingdom

Thanks for your interest in this category. I was using it because there was already a similar category for Milvus milvus in flight in Wales.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Well, in fact I have only acted according to the speedy-tagging by Boylarva99. The edit-summary was his/hers. Or was your comment meant as a "hidden" restore-request? --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

No, I am not hiding anything. I wondered whether the flying kites also need attention.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Feel free to restore the cat if you thinks it's needed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Links on deleted files

I noticed that the provided link to 'Deletion_requests' on [23] is not clickable. An issue within the template? Wickey (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Hmm, when I enter URL https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:NVU_logo.png, I do get to Commons:Deletion requests/File:NVU logo.png. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

@Wickey: There is something odd here. There have been two files, File:NVU logo.png and File:NVU logo.svg. The png file was deleted in 2017 after a deletion request. The svg file has just been deleted by Túrelio. The page that you have linked to is connected to the svg file, but it points to the png file discussion with an unclickable link. Túrelio: Could it be that the link is manually added, but with single [ ] instead of double [[ ]]? That could explain it. --TU-nor (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Not odd. For both files, the same reason is valid. An external link should be single [ ]. I could not find the source of the message-box.--Wickey (talk) 15:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes, but external links do not work in edit summaries, while wikilinks do, so to be clickable, it would have to be entered as [[Commons:Deletion_requests/File:NVU_logo.png]] and not as [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:NVU_logo.png]. --TU-nor (talk) 15:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

I see, I did not recognize it as an edit summary. BTW, the message-box at Commons:Deletion requests/File:NVU logo.png does not provide a link to the deletion discussion of that file, actually.--Wickey (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Logos associated with entertainment and leisure in Sweden

Hello. Category was moved to where? Eurohunter (talk) 22:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Nochmals: WRB Cover

Hi Túrelio, danke für deine Antwort vom 6. Oktober, aber so richtig beruhigt bin ich nicht. Was bedeutet der Satz "If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT agent, this file will be deleted." Danke. Eleutheropodic (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Üblicherweise bedeutet das, was der Text sagt, also dass die Datei 30 Tage nach der 1. Antwort des VRT-Bearbeiters gelöscht wird, wenn keine gültige Genehmigung eingegangen ist. Hier liegt es aber doch anders, da ja in der verlinkten pdf-Datei eine generelle Genehmigung vorliegt. D.h., selbst im Fall, dass keine explizite Genehmigung positiv eintrifft, z.B. weil der mutmaßliche Lizenzgeber sich nicht meldet, würde ich die Datei auf jeden Fall in einen regulären LA (anstelle es SLA) stecken, um die o.g. gen. Genehmigung zu diskutieren. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Der Lizenzgeber Stefaan Dondeyne hat am 23.10. ein E-Mail an Moheen geschickt und nochmals die Freigabe bestätigt. Es kam keine Reaktion. Es sind nur noch 2 Tage, bis die 30 Tage vorbei sind. Kannst du etwas machen? Eleutheropodic (talk) 03:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Eleutheropodic,

du brauchst dir wirklich nicht so viel Sorge zu machen. Die Datei trägt ja keinen no-permission-Baustein; dann wäre eine gewisse "Gefahr" gegeben. Eine Datei, die nur einen OTRS-pending-Baustein trägt, wird kein Admin einfach so löschen. Erst wenn ein OTRS/VRT-Bearbeiter sie mit einem speedy-Baustein versieht, steht eine Löschung an. Du kannst ja ggf. mal auf dem OTRS-Noticeboard nachfragen. Aber die OTRS/BRT-Bearbeiter sind fast immer überlastet. --Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, nun ist es doch passiert. Der WRB Cover wurde gelöscht. Stefaan Dondeyne hatte mir mittlerweile geschrieben, dass er Antwort von Moheen erhalten hatte, dieser ihm ein Formular geschickt hat, und er es ausgefüllt zurückgeschickt hat. Trotzdem wurde der Cover nun gelöscht. Aber wenn ich dich recht verstanden habe, hätte es dieses Formular sowieso gar nicht gebracht, weil ja das ganze Dokument open access ist. Könntest du das Problem bitte lösen und den Cover wiederherstellen. Danke. Eleutheropodic (talk) 17:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Meinst du jetzt eine andere Datei als die hier User talk:Krd#File:WRB, 4th edition, Cover.jpg behandelte? --Túrelio (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, genau diese Datei meine ich. Danke fürs Erledigen. Ich mache jetzt also die Löschungen überall wieder rückgängig. ~ Eleutheropodic (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Commons:AI generated media

Hi, Don't you think that keeping a redirect might be useful? The talk page redirects to Commons talk:AI-generated media. Yann (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

might be. However, it was speedy-tagged by the same user that had created it. Anyway, feel free to restore. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

PD-Italy

Hello Túrelio,

Years ago, before to upload any photograph under PD-Italy, I deeply checked these PD-Italy rules with some Commons admins, such as Patrick Rogel (RIP) and recently as Racconish or Ruthven. They can confirm this point if you need. Except for a mistake (rivista with Genevieve Grad), the other file I usually upload under PD-Italy are controled and valid.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Racconish

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ruthven

Have a nice day. Tisourcier (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Tisourcier,

feel free to invite them to the DR: If they comment over there, it has more value (for others) than on my talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

To refer as another example :

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Louis_de_Fun%C3%A8s_%E2%80%94_L%27Homme_orchestre_(1970).jpg Tisourcier (talk) 13:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned deletion page

Hi, Túrelio, here is a orphaned deletion page to deal with. 0x0a (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

File:АэропортЛеонов1.jpg

Hi, Túrelio. Can I be interested this photo. I'm creater this photo and why did you delete it? You're deleted it allegedly for possible copyright violation: "no evidence of a free license at the claimed source". What? I'm eagerly waiting explanation from you! SlavaMK1 (talk) 11:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi SlavaMK1,

hmm, File:АэропортЛеонов1.jpg was uploaded by User:Dnl plnsk and was deleted already on May 5th. Source had been given as https://spectrum-group.ru/mezhdunarodnyj-aeroport-kemerovo/ and author als "© Copyright 2023 Spectrum. All Rights Reserved." --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

I looked at the source and did not find the copyright holder of this photo on this resource. I honestly don’t know how the description of the photo was changed on Wikidata. Well, will you can restore it and return back? I would to sort out the file information if you restore this SlavaMK1 (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Honestly, I cannot restore an image from a source that expressedly states "All Rights Reserved.", it would be a copyvio. Besides, you got already the source (it's the first of the 3 images). The rest of the description is meaningless, it says twice "© Copyright 2023 Spectrum. All Rights Reserved." --Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Quantico Marines Basketball 1955-56 Roster P02.jpg

Please delete this redirect. There is no reason to keep it. I accidently loaded the wrong file and requested it be deleted within minutes, so there are no uses of the file. Thanks! Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Flickr-Duplikate

Hi @Túrelio, danke Dir für die Korrektur der beiden Flickr-Duplikate. Ich hatte lediglich anhand der Flickr-Bild-ID in Commons recherchiert, weil die häufig in den Namen übernommen wird. Mangels Treffern hatte ich dann angenommen, dass die beiden Bilder noch nicht auf Commons seien... Viele Grüße Fl.schmitt (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Zora Mazora

Hallo Turelio, ich habe Robin Lambrecht erreicht, er hat bereits eine mail mit angehängten bildernd und urls an die angegebene mailadresse gesendet. Ich bitte noch um etwas geduld bevor die bilder gelöscht werden, ich habe ihn vorher nicht erreicht. danke, zora 2A02:810A:113F:83E4:E549:D5E0:DF25:990E 13:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Ja, kein Problem. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

File:OleskivMI.png

You have removed the file. However, it belongs to a civil servant and is posted on the official website, so by law it is public information. 2 is the license specified "This file is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication ". Additional link https://www.tourism.gov.ua/management-bio, please restore the file. Inoveritas (talk) 11:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Seems I've overlooked the fineprint line below the image. The rest is irrelevant; "public information" does not translate into "no copyright". --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Why

Hello Turélio, would you please tell me the reason why you deleted the category "Exterior of Zionskirche (Worpswede)" this morning? It was only empty because another user had emptied it before. I don't understand such a behaviour. When I created that deleted category some time ago, I had certain thoughts about that in my mind, it was no nonsense. Best regards --Maimaid (talk) 21:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, more discussion can be found at User talk:Subbass1#Warum?. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Maimaid, ich habe die Kategorie gelöscht, weil sie leer und mit dem speedy-Baustein markiert war. Das speedy-Skript übernimmt automatisch die vom "Markierer" genannte Löschbegründung in die edit-summary. Eine gelöschte Kategorie kann auf Wunsch verlustlos wieder hergestellt werden; denn die Löschung ist ja (normalerweise) rein aus Wartungsgründen und nicht aus rechtlichen Gründen (wie z.B. copyvio) erfolgt. Es stehen täglich hunderte Kategorien zur Löschung an, fast immer, weil sie leer sind. Deshalb ist es kaum möglich jedesmal nachzuforschen, ob sie kurz vorher geleert wurde, zumal das nicht so einfach ist. Wenn du möchtest, stelle ich die o.g. Kategorie gerne wieder her. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio (diesmal richtig geschrieben),

dankeschön für die Erklärung. Dein Angebot, die Kategorie wieder herzustellen, nehme ich gerne an. Vielen Dank! Maimaid (talk) 10:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank! Maimaid (talk) 10:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Brandt family.jpg

Can you delete it? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.233.237.136 (talk) 07:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Can you delete also File:Heinrich Berger.jpg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.233.237.136 (talk • contribs)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

FN FAL in the Corps of Naval Fusiliers

What was so bad about this category? Deleting it and sending all of its pictures back to "FN FAL in Brazilian service" mixes up marines (all of whom can be identified as such through uniforms, file sources and even filenames) and policemen in the same unsorted category. It also means "FN FAL in the Brazilian Navy" is missing all of the aforementioned images of marines, who are part of the Navy. And yet simply moving those images to "FN FAL in the Brazilian Navy" would mix up marines and sailors, which is precisely why marines were given a subcategory. Serraria (talk) 11:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Assuming you are relating to Category:FN FAL in the Corps of Naval Fusiliers, you should discuss this with User:Tm, who requested this cat for deletion. I performed the deletion, as the cat was empty. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

My apologies. I'll see what I can do. Serraria (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

@Serraria As you might as well know combat in the Caatinga is not a specialty of the Corpo de Fuzileiros Navais, as you mixed in that category several images of soldiers with clearly marked shoulder tabs with "Caatinga" on their uniforms, as yourself removed File:16 08 2021 Demonstração Operativa por ocasião da Operação Formosa - 2021 (51382832388).jpg, File:16 08 2021 Demonstração Operativa por ocasião da Operação Formosa - 2021 (51383615690).jpg, File:16 08 2021 Demonstração Operativa por ocasião da Operação Formosa - 2021 (51383331674).jpg, File:16 08 2021 Demonstração Operativa por ocasião da Operação Formosa - 2021 (51382588131).jpg and moved to "FN FAL in Brazilian Army" . Please, instead of automatically presuming that images where soldiers use an FN FAL and that are sourced from the Marinha do Brasil and depicted military exercises commandand by the Corpo de Fuzileiros Navais always depict soldiers from that unit and move all files, look first to see what branch of the brazilian armed forces is is fact depicted (or other foreign military). Cheers. @Túrelio Sorry for using your talkpage to answer to Serraria, instead of his talkpage. If needed be to continue this talk, other userpage can be used. Thanks. Tm (talk) 18:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

No problem to continue the discussion here, if needed. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Bad category of Lajos Szász

Dear Túrelio! Thank you very much for the quick action, the deletion! :-)) Hi! Bizottmány (talk) 10:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Konstantine Anthony, 2022.jpg

I saw that you deleted this image back in September. I am obviously not a City of Burbank employee, but Template:PD-CAGov states that a work made by a government unit (including cities like Burbank) are public domain, so it shouldn't have been deleted in the first place unless there's a copyright from a non-employee photographer. I also don't like being called a "political party meat puppet for Anthony" just because of this. reppop^talk 06:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sorry you feel offended by the original nominator's deletion-rationale, which is adopted automatically into the edit-summary. Nominator User:Sleeplessmason had justified the deletion-request by "The uploader is not a City of Burbank employee and did not have permission from the City to upload this image. Verified with City of Burbank. ..." That seemed plausible enough for me.

In addition, the source-site states "© Copyright 2023 City of Burbank. All Rights Reserved", which seems to contradicts that its content falls under PD-CAGov.

If you absolutely insist, I can convert this from a speedy to a regular DR to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

PD-CAGov directly states that "It is a public record that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, and is therefore in the public domain in the United States." Burbank as a city is not listed under "Agencies permitted to claim copyright". reppop^talk 14:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Most California government websites have a copyright notice, including the State Senate and State Assembly, but from how I see it, they can't claim copyright due to California law. I fail to see how Burbank is different. reppop^talk 15:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

I would like to add another line from Template:PD-CAGov: "County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so. This applies even if there is a copyright notice, so long as the State of California or one of its agencies is indicated as the copyright holder." So the copyright notice doesn't contradict it, as it directly says that even if it had it, its still public domain. reppop^talk 07:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Just to let you know, since now I'm in a discussion where that very editor is still calling me "biased" for uploading this, it's was undeleted for the same reasoning as mine back in November. Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-11#File:Konstantine_Anthony,_2022.jpg reppop^talk 21:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

banners

Good morning. A few years ago I used this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MotherTeresa_094-1(cropped).jpg to create graphics for a procession with saints. Various saints are included in this graphic. Unfortunately, I didn't sign it :( maybe I didn't pay attention to it, I'm very sorry. I changed these photos in the digital versions, there are printed versions on a banner, where about 60 banners informing about the campaign are displayed every year. How can I compensate for the lack of a signature? Adrianperec1990 (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

deletions

Can you delete "Leonhard von Moellendorff", "Franz Herber (Offizier)", "Franz Herber (officer)", and "Kurt Salterberg"? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.207.178.46 (talk) 14:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the redirect. Can you do also the other three for copyrigh violation? 95.234.110.185 09:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Can you do also the last one, "Leonhard von Moellendorff"? 95.234.110.185 11:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. 95.234.110.185 11:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Since there isn't any files, can you delete also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Leonhard_von_M%C3%B6llendorff? Thank you. 95.248.233.195 12:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Нурлан_Камитов_(архитектор).jpg

Good afternoon! You deleted the media file for the reason: Copyright violation: https://vlast.kz/novosti/28897-kazahstanskij-arhitektor-stal-pocetnym-clenom-korolevskogo-instituta-britanskih-arhitektorov.html On this website, it is written under the photo that it was provided by INK Architects - the founder of this company is the person in this photo - Nurlan Kamitov. Before that, the photo was published on Wikimedia Commons under a license. Could you restore this file Филатова Елена (talk) 14:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Филатова Елена,

User:Нелли Ергалиева uploaded this image as "own work" in 2022 and claimed it to be from 2020. However, the user, who nominated it for deletion, had found it prepublished already in 2018 under the above linked publication, which credits it to "INK Architects". The latter fact makes the "own work"-claim by our uploader unplausible. If the image is important for wikipedia, the best solution would be to contact INK Architects and ask them whether they are able and willing to release the image under a free license, such as the claimed cc-by-sa license, and confirm that to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Review

Hi Túrelio hope you are doing good ? Can you review my uploads

1. File:Ishaan Singh Manhas.jpg
2. File:Sumit Arora.jpg

Thanks Pp01902 (talk) 11:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Deletions

Can you delete "File:Heinrich Berger (1905-1944).jpg", "File:General von Kortzfleisch.png", and "File:Franz J. Müller.gif" as requested for copyright violation? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.20.12.95 (talk) 11:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

The latter 2 can't be speedied, as they are in the ongoing Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ushiwaka1189. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Can you delete also "File talk:Heinrich Berger (1905-1944).jpg"? 95.239.125.208 10:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

I think you can delete also the latter 2. 193.207.134.32 18:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Can you delete them? 79.17.233.177 09:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Template:Precision1

Can you also delete this page? 阿南之人 (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Wasim Sajjad.png

Hi! Hope you are doing well! Can you please verify license for this image? Wallu2 (talk) 16:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Overwriting

Hi. I'm not sure if you'll be able to help but recently I'm not able to overwrite images when using CropTool. I get the following message: "Upload failed! [api] Received error: abusefilter-disallowed : ⧼abusefilter-warning-file-overwriting⧽". Any ideas how I could fix this or who to get in touch with for help? Many thanks in advance. ArturSik (talk) 14:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi ArturSik,

sorry, but I never used the CropTool and there have no experience with it. When I want to crop an image, I usually use the freeware IrfanView and its lossless crop-function. --Túrelio (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi. No worries. Thanks anyway for replying. I will try my luck at Help desk. All the best to you :) ArturSik (talk) 14:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Uploaded again

File:Natashia Williams-Blach 2013 Fitness Expo Press Photo.jpg — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

 Deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Lost redirected file

Dear Túrelio,

I can not find a file that has been redirected. The original file name is File:0-02-05-6a8b280f92fb4b281f6afb5aa20cb7422da8aa29dfd8f25ebaf9c73aa84a8163 48498c82422e2649.jpg.

Is there a possibility that the overall file was deleted? And if yes, why?

Best regards, Dandarmkd (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Dandarmkd,

you are correct. The redirect seems to have been nosense from the beginning, as there is no evidence that a file with the target-filename ever existed. I've therefore restored the original file and deleted the redirect. You should check whether the requested renaming makes sense. I could then perform it. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello Túrelio,

I think it would be the best to move the file, just like the uploader requested. Plus the original name of the file is not very suitable. The new proposed name is more adequate than the actual name.

Dandarmkd (talk) 09:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ludwig_Feldgen.jpg

Der Uploader ist doch nicht der Urheber mit der Lizenz CC40, oder? Welcher Lizenzbaustein braucht das Bild? Atamari (talk) 14:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Hab den Hochlader mal nach der Quelle gefragt. --Túrelio (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Joko Widodo

@Túrelio Hi, you recently deleted a photo: Presiden-jokowi-disambut-oleh-presiden-ukraina-volodymyr-zelenskyy.jpg. However, I got that from a reliable source and they allow distribution. See https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/glava-derzhavi-proviv-peregovori-z-prezidentom-indoneziyi-ya-76133, and at the bottom of the website says "All materials featured on this site are is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. The use of any materials posted on the website is permitted provided you link to www.president.gov.ua regardless of full or partial use of materials." What was the reason you deleted the photo? Can you please undo? Legitaxi (talk) 04:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Legitaxi: ,

material licensed under NC, ND or NC+ND are not considered free enough per our policy COM:L. That was the reason for the deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

File:FBI exhibit - Joe Biggs in the Capitol on January 6, 2021.png

@Túrelio You recently deleted this image as a repost of the content deleted after Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joe Biggs from DOJ Case Number 1-21-cr-175 Biggs - Affidavit.png, which was deleted because it was not actually in the source provided, meaning we couldn't verify it's origin or copyright status. Only having seen the discussion after the deletion, I took the time to track down the original source and confirm it's PD-USGov. I would appreciate if you would restore it. Feoffer (talk) 01:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Pleas see Commons:Deletion requests/File:FBI exhibit - Joe Biggs in the Capitol on January 6, 2021.png. --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Can we do something about this?

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gajendra Singh Shekhawat official portrait Lok Sabha.jpg this has been nominated for deletion discussion since 29 October 2023. And its been 15 days since last comment. You and others have deleted files uploaded from same website which are not its product but of Parliament's. At first I thought that discussion was not needed but then I was corrected. But now I am concerned on the slow pace of action. Please see if you can do something about it. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 13:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio I removed things that have been dealt with. Hope there is nothing wrong since noone replied to it yet. But the primary concern I came here with still stands. The deletion discussion which is not progressing and the two votes that are there have called for deletion. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Alipay logo.svg

Hi, Túrelio. I plan to add this logo to the TOO China case, because it has already passed copyright registration in China. Could you please check the download link for me? Thanks in advance. 0x0a (talk) 07:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi, it had already been deleted by a colleague of mine. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I mean the source URL. 0x0a (talk) 08:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

At the source, https://gw.alipayobjects.com/os/rmsportal/trUJZfSrlnRCcFgfZGjD.ai, a collage of many logos is shown. Is this intended for the page where you want to link it? Otherwise, a link to the single logo might be better, if available. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

I understand. I'll to extract it and upload to the archive.org. 0x0a (talk) 09:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Borrado de la "Bandera_del_Frente_Popular_de_Liberación_de_Palestina.svg".

El trabajo NO está basado en la obra que referís (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_of_PFLP.png), sino en en el logo directamente publicado por la propia organización en su web https://pflp.ps/thumb/290x290/style/assets/images/logopflp.png, y en las fotos publicadas en esta web en que sale su bandera. En este otro sitio hay una buena cantidad de imágenes de la bandera y del logo, https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/ps%7Dpflp.html Es bastante obvio que el logo no es propiedad de quien lo subió en su momento, y que se trata de un error al elegir la licencia de uso, o peor, de un intento malicioso de impedir que el logo se pueda utilizar en la wikipedia Solicito sea revertido el cambio y repuesto mi trabajo, que no está basado en el que se referencia. Iskraelectrica (talk) 09:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

The deletion-rationale, as presented in the deletion/edit-summary is not from me, but by the original nominator User:Thespoondragon, however, it seemed plausible to me. Anyway, if the logo is from https://pflp.ps, well, that site claims "جميع الحقوق محفوظة © 2023 - الجبهة الشعبية". No evidence of a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Entonces es evidente que se trata de impedir maliciosamente la disfusión en la wiki del logo y la bandera del Frente Popular de Liberación de Palestina. El logo que dice tener en propiedad es exactmente el que aparece en la web de la organización, es evidente que quien incumple es quien se arroga la propiedad del logo de una organización, el cual es anterior a la propia existencia de la wikipedia y del sitio web (https://www.comitelulalivre.org/en/popular-front-for-the-liberation-of-palestine-free-lula/) que se referencia para la propiedad intelectual del mismo, que es más que probable que fuera sacado de la web del FPLP. En todo caso debería borrarse este, y reponer los demás. Yo no tengo inconveniente alguno que la propiedad intelectual de mi trabajo se asigne al FPLP

Iskraelectrica (talk) 09:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

As you have repeatedly accused me of bad intentions, violating our policy COM:AGF, I am not willing to communicate with you further. Submit your request Commons:Undeletion requests. EoD. --Túrelio (talk) 11:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Disculpa si has entendido que la acusación de malicia iba dirigida a ti, estaba dirigida a quien se arrogaba los derechos sobre el logo y bandera objeto de la discusión que hablamos. Iskraelectrica (talk) 14:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mikhail_Kozlovsky._Selected_(2014-03-21)_08.jpg&redirect=no

Зачем вы удалили этот файл, заменив его на фальшивку с подложной лицензией? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 15:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Because it has been tagged by the dupe-bot and File:МБ.jpg was 7 years older. If you knew the latter has a fake-license, why didn't you tag it as copyvio? --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Delete of Kenes Rakishev and John Dodelande.jpg

hello, im so sorry, please remove this image for me. Jokerman4 (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done already by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 23:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of LeAnna Cumber headshot 2022

Hi, I uploaded LeAnna's picture to her wiki page at her request. It is a photo that she and others use often. What do I need to do to keep it on her bio page? I am not a big editor and mainly joined to update pages for the Cumbers. (I'm their assistant). Any help is appreciated. MercyDaye (talk) 16:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi, we are talking about File:LeAnna Headshot 2022.jpg, right? You claimed it to be own work, which you can do legitimately only, if you are the photographer, which seems not to be the case. If you are Mrs. Cumber's assistant, you should ask her (or her legal dep., if available), who is the photographer of this shot and who owns the copyright (per default the photographer; though, he/she may give it to others). If the copyright is still with the photographer, Mrs. Cumber (or her laywer) needs to obtain full copyright from the photographer, in order to release this image under a free license. Else, you could ask the photographer whether he would agree to release this image under a free license, which allows anybody else to use the image for free, though the photographer always needs to be credited. If Mrs. Cumber already has the copyright bought or transferred from the photographer to her, she by herself can release the image under a free license, as is required for uploads to Commons/Wikipedia.

To document the release of an image under a free license, go to Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file and copy the text in the box/rectangle to a word-processor, enter the filename of the image and fill-in the variable fields (w. square brackets). Then, you should send/give the finalized release-text to the rightsholder, who wants to give the permission. He/She then nees to put his/her name and the date under it and send it directly (own email-account; no forwarding) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The email will not be made public and only our OTRS-volunteers have access to it. They will check the permission and likely confirm it and then put a permission-tag ("ticket") on the image-page (or undeleted the image, if already deleted). --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Please see User talk:Nanyongaa for a discussion about File:Dr. Balaam Barugahara Ateenyi.jpg now deleted

The editor considers the upload to have been valid. I disagree. I felt I ought to show you this discussion since you are the deleting admin. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Redirect request

Hi. Is it possible to redirect File:Joanna Kulig signature.jpg to File:Joanna Kulig signature.png as only the background has been removed and there is no use for the original? Many thanks ArturSik (talk) 12:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Much appreciated. ArturSik (talk) 13:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Restore user talk page

Hi, Túrelio. User:Jungan1104‎ is blaming for tagging the files he uploaded as copyvio. He also requested and deleted his talk page. Can it be restored so anyone can get the facts? 0x0a (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

I found the user-talkpage well in place. Did you mean their userpage? They can indeed delete that one, if they want. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I mean user-talkpage, which was deleted few days ago. 0x0a (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Deleted user talk pages cannot be permanently restored. Jungan1104 (talk) 04:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Redirect file

Hello, can you restore this file, because it is upside down? This should be redirected to this, not the other way around. Regards, Exagren (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Deletions requested

"Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ushiwaka1189" ("General von Kortzfleisch.png", "Franz J. Müller.gif"), "Koyata Yamamoto – group photo (1956).jpg", "Shinano Bridge Movie Institute opening ceremony, 13 April 1924.jpg" (Error: he isn't Koyata Yamamoto).

Thank you

Thank you for sorting out all those duplicate scarecrow pictures from Geograph. When I upload them, the system does not always tell me that they are duplicates, so your patience in this task is much appreciated. Storye book (talk) 09:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Deletion page

Hi Túrelio, thanks for deleting User talk:Nilo1926/common.js. Is it possible to delete the page too? If I inserted the deletion template in User talk:Nilo1926/common.js I don't think it works, is that correct? Have a nice day and thank you again. Nilo1926 (talk) 08:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, "possible to delete the page too" - do you refer to User:Nilo1926/common.js ? --Túrelio (talk) 11:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Revert description page

File:Tia Ballard (53285376858).jpg 's description was messed up by BigBoss8969, please revert to the previous version. Thank you. 0x0a (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done. However, you don't need to be an admin to do that. --Túrelio (talk) 11:12, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Got it. I thought the admin could restore it with one click. 0x0a (talk) 11:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

No, as description and file "run parallel". Actually, an admin-colleague had already reverted the file-version, but likely hadn't seen that the vandal had also messed up the description. --Túrelio (talk) 11:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Bot: Eliminando "Innovación_Low-tech.jpg". Borrado en Commons por Túrelio. (Copyright violation: The website given as the source is marked "©Copyright 2022 Low-tech Nation, tous droits réservés")

"The website given as the source is marked "©Copyright 2022 Low-tech Nation, tous droits réservés". Not anymore, this is our website : https://lowtechnation.com/

Please upload the image again, thank you. CorneliaSupera (talk) 17:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I don't understand your argument. Even if the image had been taken from lowtechnation.com, there is still the problem of copyright. If you are a representative of "Low-tech Nation", as suggested by your wording "our", you should ask the legal department or representative of "Low-tech Nation" to confirm the choosen free license (cc-by-sa-4.0}) for said image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), provided "Low-tech Nation" has obtained the full copyright from authors Arthur Keller and Emilien Bournigal. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Heinz Grill.jpg

Hi Turelio, today, 5. Dez. 2023 14:51 you deleted the File:Heinz Grill.jpg (Copyright violation). I didn't upload it, but used it in an article. The image had been uploaded by another user with the note that it was his own work. What was the copyright infringement? Robert Lindermayr (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, der Grund war, dass das Bild aufgrund einer Reihe von hits in Google-Images als copyvio-suspected markiert worden war, z.B. hier: https://www.kinderyoga-heute.de/yoga%20fuer%20erwachsene.htm . In solchen Zweifelsfällen wird gemäß COM:PCP gelöscht. Wenn du glaubwürdige Information hast, dass die Angabe des Hochladers doch stimmen könnte; kann ich das Bild in eine reguläre Löschdiskussion stecken. --Túrelio (talk) 17:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Ok; ja, man sieht, dass dieses Bild des Öfteren benutzt wird.

Ich wollte noch eine Frage an dich richten, ohne einen neuen Abschnitt zu eröffnen: Bei verschiedenen hochgeladenen Scans von Fotos eines nicht mehr aufgelegten Yogabuches wurde heute bei mir ein Vermerk gesetzt "Der Autor des Buches ist offensichtlich nicht der Fotograf, und der Hochlader auch nicht, es fehlt also die Genehmigung des Fotografen" Ich habe definitiv die Erlaubnis des Ausführenden der Asana und Autors, aber bisher nicht die des Fotographen, das ist richtig.

1. Die Argumentation erscheint logisch. Kannst du sie auch bestätigen?
2. Wenn ja. Zu jedem Vermerk bei den einzelnen Scans ist ja die Möglichkeit verlinkt, über einen Freigabe-Assistenten die Angaben zu machen. Relativ am Anfang bei diesem Assistenten besteht die Möglichkeit, zu einer Datei weitere hinzufügen. Später kommt der Punkt, an dem der Fotograph mit Mailadresse anzugeben ist. Ist das ok, wenn ich das so mache? Kann ich mir also viel Arbeit sparen und auf einmal für alle Fotos den Fotographen und seine Zustimmung angeben?

Robert Lindermayr (talk) 20:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Non-duplicate deleted using duplicate tag.

Túrelio,

Temporarily undelete please this so I can see the file again. I have may have a question or two. Thanks, --Ooligan (talk) 20:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

@Ooligan, here you are: File:Tripolitza.png. --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, Ooligan (talk) 16:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Túrelio, this File:tripolitza.png is not an "exact duplicate" of the current redirected file. One map is in French language and the other in German. So, these two maps are similar, but NOT the same.

German map- File:Tripolis Arkadien BV043560203.jpg map is dated 1805 by the source here: [24].

French map- File:tripolitza.png map is dated between 1798 and 1801 by the source here: [25]

Please, restore this file by reversing the redirect.

I have reverted one smaller version (overwritten) to the original and bigger version, which I then cropped out the blank area.

I left a message here: User talk:Enyavar#You tagged a duplicate that is not an exact duplicate. These files should never have been nominated under the "exact duplicate" process. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 08:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

A belated 'Thank You' for helping me save this unique file Túrelio. Best Regards, -- Ooligan (talk) 04:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Redirect zurücknehmen

Hallo Túrelio, in der Stadt Bamberg steht die Neue Residenz, die u.a. die Staatsgalerie Bamberg beherbergt, die wiederum Teil der Bayerischen Staatsgemäldesammlung ist. Leider wurde die Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg verschoben nach Category:Residenzmuseum Bamberg. Es gibt aber kein Residenzmuseum Bamberg. Wie kann der ursprünglich korrekte Zustand wiederhergestellt werden? Siehe hierzu auch Wikidata Q29343359 (Staatsgalerie in der Neuen Residenz Bamberg). Nemracc (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Nemracc,

den Logs nach scheint die Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg nie wirklich genutzt worden zu sein. Sie wurde von User:Jane023 am 26.6.2015 bereits als redirect erstellt. Es wäre jedenfalls gut, wenn du Umsetzung auf den "neuen" bzw. eigentlich korrekten Cat-Namen auf der Disku der alten bzw. eher inkorrekten Cat thematisierst bzw. ankündigst. Falls keine Diskussion aufkommt, scheint es mir angemessen, 1 Woche später die Umsetzung durchzuführen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, wie von Dir vorgeschlagen habe ich am 7. Januar die Rücknahme des redirect von Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg auf Category:Residenzmuseum Bamberg auf beiden Diskussionseiten vorgeschlagen - bis jetzt keine Resonanz. Da ich bald eigene Bilder bzgl. der Staatsgalerie Bamberg hochladen werde, möchte ich vorher das redirect zurück nehmen. Wie wird der redirect also zurück genommen? Muss ich vorher alle Kategorien und files verschieben auf Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg? Vorab Danke für jegliche Hilfe! Nemracc (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Nemracc,

den redirect habe ich nun entfernt, allerdings ist die cat-Datei noch leer. Sie hatte ja auch nie als solche existiert. Könnte nun der komplette Inhalt von Category:Residenzmuseum Bamberg dort hineinkopiert werden (also ist das sachlich richtig?)? --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Ich hab jetzt mal die Inhalte herübergeschoben. Du müsstest dasselbe noch mit den in der alten cat enthaltenen Dateien machen. Was noch nicht klappt, ist die Zuordnung auf WikiData, obwohl ich dort das cat-Ziel korrigiert habe. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Dann werde ich jetzt über cat-a-lot die restlichen files nach Staatsgalerie Bamberg verschieben. Danke für die Unterstützung. Nemracc (talk) 19:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Nachtrag wegen "sachlich richtig": Die restlichen files die noch in der "alten" Kategorie Residenzmuseum z. Z. sind, gehören alle in die Staatsgalerie Bamberg.

Images License

Hi can you verify these image licenses please! File:Babar azam 2023.jpg File:M Rizwan.jpg.Wallu2 (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Stawky Muchawka.png

Hi. The user does not understand the rules of Commons. This must be stopped. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Reloading deleted file (User:Polarlys). The third time. --Микола Василечко (talk) 22:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Reason for File delete 'File:Akhtarul Iman Official Portrail.jpg'

• The reason of file delete is (Copyright violation: Source website says their work is copyrighted) but in reference where it says that the violation of copyright? I am providing you the reference here.

Constituency no		Cons Name	MLA name	Gender	Party	contact	email Id
56		Amour	Akhtarul Iman	Male_	AIMIM	9431267572	mla-amour-bih@nic.in

• please go through it. and do the needful Thank you.

Eaglespirit (talk) 07:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

@Eaglespirit What do you anticipate being done? There is no licencing on the link you have provided. No onward licencing means it is not licenced or onward use.

Also "and do the needful" is not polite. If you hope for people to offer assistance I suggest a better approach. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 18:01, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

I do not have the knowledge to judge these

Please will you examine https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Eaglespirit&ilshowall=1 and consider the large number of maps. I do not have the knowledge to know whether these are allowed here. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

I suppose an alternative would be for me to nominate them all as requiring permission. That might settle it. I'd just rather not create work for someone else if I can avoid doing do with advice. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Kenkichi Tomimoto

"Tomimoto family.jpg" and "Tomimoto couple.jpg" are very better and sufficient for his family, then can you delete "Kenkichi Tomimoto and his daughter, beginning of 1917.jpg", "Kenkichi Tomimoto, his family and his mother in front of his workshop, 1918.jpg", "Kenkichi Tomimoto and his family, end of 1917.jpg"? And also "Kenkichi Tomimoto (left) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg" and "Kenkichi Tomimoto in front of his house, circa 1918.jpg"? Thank you. --Shirogane10 (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Shirogane10,

the proper way to eventually have them deleted is a regular deletion-request, but not to tag images as duplicates when they aren't. --Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Ok, but can you just delete them? --Shirogane10 (talk) 09:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

No; it requires a discussion, as they have been uploaded under a free license already some time ago. An immediate deletion is only possible by request of uploader within 7 days after upload (or if there are other reasons for speedy deletion per our policies). --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arnold Schönberg Variationen für Orchester op. 31 excerpt.mp3

Hi, did you accidentally put this file in the undeletion category for the wrong year? Thanks for checking! Gnom (talk) 10:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Also ich ich hatte die Datei am 16.1.2022 wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alois Vladislav Vraný, Motlitba (1881).jpeg

Hi, Why was this deleted? The file is in the public domain. Is there anything else not mentioned in the DR? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I had deleted it, based on the uploaders request "Speedydelete|uploader request deletion, copyright violation". However, it seems I hadn't noticed the previous editwarring. --Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

File:The Twilight of Idols, The Case of Wagner, Nietzsche Contra Wagner.djvu

This file has been re-uploaded with the problematic content removed; can you please restore the deleted metadata? Thanks :) Beleg Tâl (talk) 22:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Corrupt Geograph files?

Hi, why did you delete these files?

• File:Gas platform in Morecambe Bay - geograph.org.uk - 5556997.jpg
• File:Green directions sign facing Darlington Street Wigan - geograph.org.uk - 5551233.jpg
• File:Eastern European Food store, 9-11 Darlington Street, Wigan - geograph.org.uk - 5551241.jpg
• File:Bankfield Road - geograph.org.uk - 5552177.jpg
• File:Manchester Ship Canal - geograph.org.uk - 5550663.jpg

They all look fine to me. Multichill (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I don't really remember, as this was 2 months ago. Per the logs, they all had been tagged {{SD|F7}} within 7 days of upload. Feel free to restore them, as this was anyway a weak rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Nothing wrong with these files. Don't you check files before you delete them? Multichill (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

I might have mistaken the F7 for a G7. Anyway, my fault. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Photo de René Levy sociologue

Bonjour, Vous avez retiré le 9 décembre dernier une photo de Commons intitulée "René_Levy_sociologue.jpg". Il s'agit d'une photo qui a été faite par un photographe lors d'une manifestation scientifique. Ce photographe nous a aimablement donné la photo en étant d'accord pour que cette photo soit intégrée dans Commons et Wikipédia en licence libre. J'ai inséré cette photo en donnant le lien du photographe. Votre argument pour supprimer cette photo est de dire que le lien n'est pas clair, que cette photo n'est pas visible. La photo n'étant effectivement pas au bout du lien donné, que faut-il faire pour que ce lien soit plus clair à vos yeux. Meilleures salutations. Jean-Marie Le Goff (talk) 15:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

@Jean-Marie Le Goff: Bonjour,

Je me permets de répondre ici en français. Le photographe doit envoyer une autorisation par email. Voyez COM:VRT/fr pour les détails. N'hésitez pas à me demander si vous avez besoin d'aide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

I take the liberty to answer here in French. The photographer should send a permission by email. Please see COM:VRT for the details. Do not hesitate to ask me if you need help. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

License Review

Hi Can you please review license of these:

• File:Ali Amin Gandapur.jpg
• File:Imran Riaz Khan - February 2023.jpg
• File:Imran Riaz Khan - December 2023.jpg. Wallu2 (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Image-replacement nit

You set File:Mystetskyi Arsenal.png as a redirect to File:Mystetskyi Arsenal logo.svg. Obviously the appearance was the same, but the filetype is conceptually different. Should it have been deleted outright instead? I noticed it when the CommonsDelinker request for it was flagged as out-of-process. DMacks (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Deleted Photo

Hello, You deleted the file anthonysilva3.jpg yesterday because you said it was not sourced from the individual's social media account. In an attempt to determine what you were talking about, I utilized Google Lens as well which only turned up the photo on on a website called Capital Radio who indicated they sourced it from the person's LinkedIn. Since this is also a social media account, I feel you're splitting hairs here as the person's LinkedIn is now defunct. Despite this, I re-uploaded it, indicating it's from LinkedIn. I can also link you the original, public Facebook post from 2012 if you'd like to see it. Additionally, I don't understand your comment that it came from the 2010's which would include the year 2012. DreadPirateRoberts1 (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, neither Facebook nor LincedIn are legitimate sources for uploads to Commons, as they are not under a free license. In addition, the above cited edit-summary/deletion-rationale were not by me, but by the image-tagger User:メイド理世. Anyway, there is no evidence for this image being under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Collezione Microbica.jpg

Plase reestore this image, Stefania is clearly the author. Just ask, there is no need to hurry. We were also preparing a post about it. Hours of time lost for soething that could have been solved just putting a warning template and a starting deletion procedure. Users who share high qualty photo should be encouraged. Plus, she is an established account not a newbie, it would have been more logic to simply ask. Good photographers ashare photos on line, it's 2023.

In any case you know her father is at the hospital now, probably dying? Under Christmas. She took few hours to share a good quality photo and that's how we treat her. I love these wonderful Christmas stories, they really cheer me up. Put it back with a warning, we have already made enough fuzz for nothing here. Alexmar983 (talk) 16:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

*ೃ༄ Feliz Navidad, Túrelio *ೃ༄ Merry Christmas and a joyous new year filled with peace, love, and happiness! Щасливого Різдва та Нового року, нехай він принесе мир, любов та радість у ваше життя! Joyeux Noël et une Bonne année pleine de paix, d'amour et de bonheur! ¡Feliz Navidad y un próspero año nuevo lleno de paz, amor y felicidad! Buon Natale e un felice anno nuovo pieno di pace, amore e felicità! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr voller Frieden, Liebe und Glück! Feliz Natal e um Ano Novo próspero repleto de paz, amor e felicidade! メリークリスマス、そして平和と愛、幸福に満ちた新年おめでとうございます！ 메리 크리스마스와 평화, 사랑, 행복이 가득한 새해 복 많이 받으세요! मेरी क्रिसमस और शांति, प्रेम, और खुशियों से भरा नया साल मुबारक हो! 圣诞快乐，新年快乐，愿你的生活充满和平、爱与幸福！ عيد ميلاد مجيد وسنة جديدة سعيدة مليئة بالسلام والحب والسعادة! С Рождеством и Новым Годом, пусть они принесут мир, любовь и счастье в вашу жизнь! God Jul och Gott Nytt År fyllt med fred, kärlek och lycka! Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar vol vrede, liefde en geluk! Wilfredor

--Wilfredor (talk) 12:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Guten Tag Túrelio,
Ich wünsche Dir ein gesegnetes Weihnachtfest.
Für das neue Jahr 2024 alles erdenklich Gute
und hoffentlich eine friedvollere Menschheit.
Vielen Dank für die vielseitige Hilfe, die Du mir zukommen lässt.
Beste Grüße.
Orchi (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasonal Greetings!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Túrelio, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 🎉

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Túrelio, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, // sikander { talk } 🦖 22:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

// sikander { talk } 🦖 22:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

04IMG 8681

Would you mind renaming the files to something meaningful Trade (talk) 13:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Sorry; OptimusPrimeBot had tagged these images wrongly. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

What do you mean Trade (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Said bot had tagged many/all of these as duplicates, without taking into account of the filename. Therefore, I had inadvertently moved from "meaningless/descriptive filename" to "meaningless filename". Now all reverted. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)